A Panacea For Food Security And Sustainable Rural Development

Mechanizing Postharvest Processing Operations: A Panacea For Food Security And Sustainable Rural Development

Department of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, P.M.B 7267, Umuahia Abia State, Nigeria.

American Journal of Agricultural Research

Food security and sustainable rural development are indispensible ingredients in attaining the Millennium Development goal (MDG) of eradicating extreme poverty and hunger. The reduced time for food preparation and the increasing demand for processed food heighten the need for developing healthy, affordable food products, and appropriate processing systems to provide food to the rapidly growing population in developing countries. Mechanizing postharvest activities has not attracted much attention from international research organizations, while research on the improvement of agricultural production has received considerable attention and funding. However, there is an emerging consensus on the critical role that postharvest systems can play in meeting the overall goals of food security, poverty alleviation and sustainable agriculture particularly in developing countries. This study focuses on the trends in mechanizing various postharvest processing operations, and its impact in attaining food security and sustainable rural development. It also highlights the set-backs to mechanization of postharvest systems.

Keywords: Mechanizing, Postharvest, Food Security, Rural Development, Processing Systems

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:
Onu, O. O., A. C. Onyenwoke, K. J. Simonyan. Mechanizing Postharvest Processing Operations: A Panacea For Food Security And Sustainable Rural Development. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 2016,1:3. DOI: 10.28933/ajar-2016-08-1203


1. Dogondaji, M. B. (2013). Towards mitigating the impacts of Climate Change on Food Security: A global Perspective. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(6):167-174 MCSER-CEMAS-Sapienza University of Rome, Rome. http:/www.mcser.org/journal
2. FAO, (1989). Production Yearbook. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome (FAO).
3. Goletti, F. and Wolff, F. (1999). The Impact of Postharvest Research. Paper prepared for the meeting on Postharvest Research at the International Centers Week, Washington, D.C., October 26, 1998.
4. Gross, K., Wang, C. Y. and Saltveit, M. E. (eds) (2004). The Commercial Storage of Fruits, Vegetables, and Florist and Nursery Stocks. [Online]. USDA Handbook 66 Available:http://www.ba.ars.usda.gov/hb66/index.html
5. Gustavsson, J., C. Cederberg, U. Sonesson, R. Van Otterdijk, and A. Meybeck (2011).“Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent Causes and Prevention.” United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome, Italy
6. Hassan, K. (2010). A Guide to Postharvest Handling of Fruits and Vegetables, Bangladesh http:/www.egfar.com
7. John, G. and Stephen, W. M. (2013). Improving Food Security through Research and Extension Education: Effects of Climate Change and Aflatoxins. Research for Development (R4D) Responses to Food Security and Poverty Reduction in Africa, pp.79-92
8. John, G. (2013). Food Security and Poverty Reduction in Africa: Taking a Different Approach Research for Development (R4D) Responses to Food Security and Poverty Reduction in Africa, pp.12-22
9. Kader, A. A. (ed.) (2002).PostharvestTechnologyofHorticulturalCrops (3rd edn).Publication 3311, Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland, CA
10. Lisa, K., Sunil, S., Susanta, K. R. and Adel, A. K. (2011). Postharvest Technology for Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities in Research, Outreach and Advocacy. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture; 91: 597– 603
11. Margaret, N. M. (2013). Agricultural Technology Development and Achievements towards Food Security and Nutrition in Kenya. Research for Development (R4D) Responses to Food Security and Poverty Reduction in Africa, pp.129-158
12. Mrema, G. C. and Rolle, R. S. (2002). Status of the postharvest sector and its contribution to agricultural development and economic growth, in Proceedings of the 9th JIRCA International Symposium 2002: Value-Addition to Agricultural Products, Ibaraki, Japan
13. Ndirika, V. I. O. (2012).Intermediate Agricultural Processing and Storage Technologies: A Panacea for Poverty Alleviation and Rural Development. 15th Inaugural Lecture Delivered by Prof. V. I. O. Ndirika at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike; 24th October, 2012.
14. Ofoh, M. C. (2013).Towards Achievinf Food Security and Other Milliennium Development Goals in Sub-Saharan African: Constraints and Prospects. Research for Development (R4D) Responses to Food Security and Poverty Reduction in Africa, pp.280-295
15. Olayemi F. F., Adegbola J. A., Bamishaiye E. I. and Daura A. M.(2010).Assessment Of Post- Harvest Challenges of Small Scale Farm Holders of Tomatoes, Bell And Hot Pepper In Some Local Government Areas of Kano State, Nigeria. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(2): 39 – 42
16. Olayemi, F. F., Adegbola, J. A., Bamishaiye, E. I. and E. E. Awagu (2011). Assessment of Post Harvest Losses of Some Selected Crops in Eight Local Government Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria. Asia Journal of Rural Development, 2011.
17. Oni, K. C.and Obiakor, S. I. (2002). Postharvest Food Food Loss Prevention: The role of the National Centre for Agricultural Mechanization (NCAM) Ilorin under the FGN/UNDP First country Cooperation (ccf-1) framework. Proceedings of National Seminar for Cooperating Agencies underCCF-1 Framework on Postharvest Food Loss Prevention, April 18-19, Ibadan, pp:1-10.
18. Rwelamira, J.K. (1997). A food security situation analysis report for the Northern Province of South Africa. Undertaken for the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research – Food Science and Technology (CSIR – FOODTEK), January, p. 5-29.
19. United States Department of Agriculture,USDA (2013, March 4). Food Security