Economic Appraisal of Kano River Irrigation Project (KRIP) Kano State, Nigeria

Economic Appraisal of Kano River Irrigation Project (KRIP) Kano State, Nigeria

1Yakubu A.A., 2K.M. Baba and 3I.Mohammed

1Department of Agricultural Economics Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria;
2Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Technology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria;
3Agricultural Economics and Extension Programme, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria

American Journal of Agricultural Research

The Kano River Irrigation (KRIP) is under the Hadejia Jamma’are River Basin Development Authourity (HJRBDA). It covers a total of 62,000.ha of land .The project was established to boost sustainable agricultural productivity of the climo-adaphic environment of the densely populated Kano in northwestern, Nigeria. The area receives a rainfall of less than 700 mm annually, this call’s for an alternative means of sustaining the population agriculturally. The general impression of irrigation project experience of Nigeria is that performance of most irrigation projects fall below pre-project expectation. Consequently irrigation project is viewed with circumspection in some quarters. The focus of the paper is to economically appraise growth of KRIP for 30 years from 1984. Modern discounting measures of Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) were used to assess the project’s four major crops: Rice, wheat, maize and tomato cultivated in the rainy and dry seasons. The result of the measures showed high positive values for both single and combined seasons. It was concluded that KRIP is the most economically viable, successful and sustainable project in Nigeria, and West Africa at large. It was recommended that remaining part of the project be completed in order to have full benefit of the project.

Keywords: Economic analysis, KRIP, rainy season, dry season, combine season, NPV, BCR.

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:
Yakubu A.A., K.M. Baba and I.Mohammed.Economic Appraisal of Kano River Irrigation Project (KRIP) Kano State, Nigeria. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 2018,3:26.

[1] Anon. Pricing strategy for raw water uses, charges, application of pricing strategy to different categories of water use/user sectors. Rome, Italy, 15pp, 2001
[2] Muhammad .A. A.. Brief on field visit to Tiga Dam and Kano River Irrigation Project- Phase I (Kadawa). A paper presented at the Training of 10,000 unemployed Youth as Advisory Service Providers. Organised by National Food Reserve Agency. Abuja. Held at IAR/ ABU, Zaria. pp 13, 1999.
[3] Ditto. S., B. Madhusudan and M.A. Akuriba. Micro Irrigation-based Vegetable Farming for Income Employment and Food Security in West Africa. In: Munir. A.H. (ed). Global Food Security. Pub. Nova Science. Inc. 2013, pp 177-199.
[4] Musa. I. K. Policy, legal and institutional frameworks for sustainable irrigation development and practice in Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the 14th National Irrigation and Seminar (eds). H.E. Igbadun and S.T. Abu. Held at Gidan Matasa, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria, 20-24th .Oct. 2014. Pp 60-84.
[5] Gittinger. P. J. Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects.Pub. John Hopkins University Press.Baltimore and London.
[6] Andreas. P.S. and Karen. F. Financial Appraisal of Irrigation Projects. Irrigation Manual Module 11. Water Resources Development and Managent Officers. FAO. Sub-regional office for East and South Africa.pp 84, 2002.
[7] Alston, J. M., G. W. Norton and P. G. Paardey. Saonce under scarcity; Principles and practice for Agricultural Research and Evaluation and Priority Setting. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press. 1995.
[8] William, A. M., Bakary, C., Diakalia, S., Mgmadoy, S. Anne, W.. The Economic Impact of Agricultural Research, A practical Guide. 1996
[9] ] Hareau, G. G., B. F. Mitis, G. W. Norton. The potential benefits of herbicide resistant transgenic rice in Uruguay: Lessons for small developing countries Food Policy 31(2006) .Pp 162-179, 2005.
[10] Aminu, K. K. Principles of Financial Management . Pub; Benchmark Ltd. Pp. 403, 2005.
[11] NEDECO. Kano River Project, Report on Design of Irrigation System Part V. (1972)
[12] JICA,. Assessment and ultimate utilization of the water resources potentials of the Hadejia–Jamm’are Komadugu – Yobe River Basin Systems. Report.190pp, 1994.
[13] Ahmadu A. Groundwater salinity status and grain yield relationship for Kadawa irrigated soils. In: Ramalan A.A.(Ed) Proceeding of 12th National Irrigation and Drainage Seminar, IAR Samaru Zaria,7-9th march, Pp 85-93, 1998.
[14] Ita, E.O. Inland fishery resources of Nigeria. CIFA. Occasional Paper:. No.20. FOA, Rome.120pp, 1993.
[15] Abdulkarim, B.,and M.L. Balarabe. Ecology of Hadejia-Nguru wet lands: strength, weaknesses and their implications to the communities of Hadejia Valley Irrigation Project: An appraisal. In: Abubakar S.Z., and, A. Marcel (Eds). Promotion of Participation o Irrigation Management in Hadejia Valley Irrigation Project, Nigeria: Experience on Appraisal Lesson. Pub. Synthesis Book.321pp, 2003.
[16] HJRBDA.Management Annual Report.13 Pp, 2001.
[17] NEDECO. Kano River Irrigation Project,11 on Land Use. 1973.
[18] IITA. Rainfall changes call for shift in cropping practices: The case of Nigeria International Institute for Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria .Annual Report. 1992.
[19] Balogun, E. E. Water supply and sanitation in Nigeria; Adequacy and prospect. A paper presented at the National Symposium on Water Resources and Rural Development, Kano, 5-10 June, Pp.12, 1994.
[20] Ingawa, S. A. National Fadama Development Project (NFDP). Achievements, constraints and prospects. In: Proceedings of the 12th National Irrigation and Drainage Seminar on irrigation in sustainable Agriculture. Ramalan A.A.(ed) 14-16 April, IAR A.B.U., Zaria. Pp. 188-201, 1998.
[21] Okoh R.M. Performance of Large Scale Irrigation Projects: A Case of Kano River Irrigation Project, Phase I. In Proc. of International Seminar on Performance of Large and Small Scale Irrigation Schemes in Africa. November 15th – 19th 1999. Abuja, Nigeria Pp 348 – 363, 1999.