Profitability Analysis of Value Added Usipa (Engraulicypris Sardella) by Packaging In Nkhotakota, Malawi


Profitability Analysis of Value Added Usipa (Engraulicypris Sardella) by Packaging In Nkhotakota, Malawi


Mbamba D1, Valeta J2, Harawa D3, Kapute F1, Singini W1 , Mzengereza K1

1Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Mzuzu University, Luwinga, Mzuzu 2, Malawi; 2Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.;3Department of Tourism and Hospitality management, Mzuzu University, Luwinga, Mzuzu 2, Malawi.


American Journal of Marine Research and Reviews

The study was conducted to determine the profitability of value addition of Engraulicypris sardella through packaging in Nkhotakota district, central Malawi. Samples(69Kg) of fresh E. sardella purchased and sundried in solar tent dryer, packaged (34.5Kg) in plastics papers while the other 34.5Kg was unpackaged. Sales data were analyzed using gross margin and net profit analysis. Benefit-cost ratio and rate of return on investment were used to determine the viability of small scale E. sardella fish business. Results of Cost and Return Analysis packaged E. sardella showed that the total revenue of packaged E. sardella was Mk225,400.00 and total cost was Mk 40,350.00 while results for unpackaged E. sardella showed that the total revenue was Mk104,144.92 and total cost was Mk20,450.00. Results on Benefit cost ratio for packaged and unpackaged E. sardella were 5.09 and 5.58 respectively. The findings implies that packaged E. sardella was more profitable than unpackaged E. sardella. The rate of return for packaged and unpackaged Engraulicypris sardella was 4.58 and 4.09 respectively, implying that for every Mk1.00 invested for Packaged Engraulicypris sardella there was a return of Mk4.58 and Mk4.09 for unpackaged Engraulicypris sardella. Packaging should be encouraged to maximize profits from small scale fish business in Malawi.


Keywords: Profitability, packaged and unpackaged Engraulicypris sardella, fisheries


Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Mbamba D, Valeta J, Harawa D, Kapute F, Singini W, Mzengereza K.Profitability Analysis of Value Added Usipa (Engraulicypris Sardella) by Packaging In Nkhotakota, Malawi. American Journal of Marine Research and Reviews, 2018; 1:8.. DOI: 10.28933/ajmrr-2018-04-3001


References:

1. Barry PJ, Ellinger PN, Baker CB, Hopkins JA (1995).Financial management in agriculture [M]. Interstate Publisher, Darville, Illinois.
2. Carvalho, N., Edwards-Jones, G., and Isidro, E., 2011. Defining scale in fisheries: Small versus large-scale fishing operations in the Azores. Fisheries Research, 109(2): 360-369.
3. De Silva, D and Masahiro, Y. (2006). Regional preferences in the Japanese Seafood consumption: An empirical analysis of consumer purchasing behavior on domestic versus imported seafood, Journal of the Regional Fisheries Society, Japan. Vol. 46, Issue 2, pp 83-104.
4. FAO, (2012). Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United nations.
5. FAO, (2005). Fishery country profile. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
6. FAO, (2011). Global food losses and food waste-extent, causes and prevention. Rome. United Nations; FAO.
7. GoM, (2007). Overview of Fish and Fish Trade in East and South Africa Region: The Fisheries Sector and Its Importance in Malawi. [Online]Available:http://www.thecommonwealth.org/shared_asp_files/GFSR.asp?NodeID
8. Government of Malawi (GoM) (2011) Annual Economic Report. Draft report. Ministry of Development Planning and Cooperation. Lilongwe, Malawi
9. . Kapute F, Singini W, Valeta J and Kamanga J, 2015. Sustainable Environment and Enterprise Development for climate change adaptation in Fisheries (SEED-Fish) baseline report. Unpublished project baseline report. Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
10. NFAP, (2016). National Fisheries and Aquaculture Policy; 2nd Edition; Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development; Lilongwe: Malawi.
11. Russell A., Dobson T., Wilson, J. (2008). Fisheries management in Malawi: A patchwork of Traditional, modern, and post-modern regimes unfolds. In: Taylor WW, Schechter MG, and Leonard NE (Eds.). International governance of fisheries ecosystems: Learning from the past, finding solutions for the future. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
12. Susan, B (1988). Journal of Food Distribution Research; Packaging: A key Element in Added value. King-Casey, Inc. New Canaan, CT.
13. Yoyola L., Dzanja J., Kakota T., and Hara, M. (2013) Value Chain Analysis of Lake Malawi Fish: A Case Study of Oreochromis species (Chambo) International Journal of Business and Social Science. 4 (2).