Effectiveness of the “Kwido-Mementia” computerized cognitive stimulation programme in older adults


Effectiveness of the “Kwido-Mementia” computerized cognitive stimulation programme in older adults


1Álvarez-Lombardía, I., 2Migueles, M., 2Aritzeta, A., 1Acedo-Gil, K.

1Grupo Servicio Sociales Integrados-(SSI)-Integrated Social Services Group
2Basic Psychological Processes Department, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)


international journal of aging research

Despite the importance of cognitive stimulation to counteract the cognitive decline associated with age, there is contradictory evidence about the benefits of cognitive training programs that are carried out through new technologies, and little evidence about those programs conducted at home. This research examines the effectiveness of a computerized cognitive stimulation program in adults 65 years old and over who are users of a home care service. The sample consisted of 43 participants (88% women) and an average age of 81.4 years. A quasi-experimental research design with a control group was carried out, where the experimental group completed a 15-session training (Kwido-Mementia). The results showed that the training program improves cognitive functions; both visuospatial memory capacity and perceptual reasoning skills. The computerized cognitive training proves to be an effective tool, not only to prevent deterioration, but also to improve the cognitive abilities of people 65 years old and over. The work contributes to clarify, in part, the existing controversy in the literature regarding the usefulness of cognitive training programs based on new technologies and provides positive evidence, contrary to what other studies indicate regarding the programs carried out at home.


Keywords: cognitive stimulation; computerized; older adults; home care


Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Álvarez-Lombardía, I., Migueles, M., Aritzeta, A., Acedo-Gil, K. Effectiveness of the “Kwido-Mementia” computerized cognitive stimulation programme in older adults. International Journal of Aging Research, 2018, 1:14. DOI:10.28933/ijoar-2018-08-0301


References:

1. Ballesteros, S., Kraft, E., Santana, S., y Tziraki, C. (2015). Maintaining older brain functionality: A targeted review. Neuroscience And Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 453-477. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.008.
2. Chiu, H., Chu, H., Jui-Chen, T., Liu, D., Ying-Ren, C., Hui-Ling, Y., & Chou, K. (2017). The effect of cognitive-based training for the healthy older people: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 12(5) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176742
3. Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). «Mini-mental state». A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-198.
4. Lampit, A., Hallock, H., y Valenzuela, M. (2014). Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Medicine, 11(11) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756.
5. Lobo, A.; Saz, P. y Marcos, G. (2002). MMSE: examen cognoscitivo mini-mental: manual. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
6. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of The American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695-699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.
7. Park, D. C., y Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology,60, 173-196.
8. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., y Park, D. C. (2014). How does it STAC up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition. Neuropsychology Review, 24(3), 355-370. doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9
9. Rey, A. (1987). Test de copia de una figura compleja : manual. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
10. Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. L. (2016). Do ‘brain-training’ programs work?. Psychological Science In The Public Interest, 17(3), 103-186. doi:10.1177/1529100616661983.
11. Thomas, A. K., Dave, J. B., y Bonura, B. M. (2010). Theoretical-perspectives on cognitive aging. In C. L. Armstrong, L. Morrow, C. L. Armstrong, L. Morrow (Eds.), Handbook of medical neuropsychology: Applications of cognitive neuroscience (pp. 297-313). New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1364-7_16.
12. Wechsler, D. (2001). WAIS-III : escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para adultos – III. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.