Exploring the need for government energy policy-makers to consider social impacts


Exploring the need for government energy policy-makers to consider social impacts


1Jane Wilson, RN*, 2Carmen M Krogh, BScPharm, 3Grace Howell, Med, EdD

1Ontario, Canada
2Independent Health Researcher, 1183 Cormac Road, RR4, Killaloe, Ontario, Canada, K0J 2A0
3Instructor, Social Foundations EDUC 5007, Western University Faculty of Education, Room 1113A, 1137 Western Rd., London, ON N6G 1G7, 519-661-2111 ext. 88619


International Journal of social research

As governments around the world aim to develop and enact policies that promote benefits to the public good, there is an increasing need to identify and acknowledge the social impacts of such policies. In some cases, the social impacts may be unexpected. An example is the social impact related to renewable energy policies, particularly as related to industrial-scale wind power generation. In Ontario, Canada, the push toward large-scale or utility-scale wind power development has resulted in: economic change; social discontent in some affected rural communities; and, concerns about adverse health effects. If the usual avenues of social input to decision-making processes have been removed by legislation, an imposed government policy may result in loss of confidence and, despite the government’s good intentions, may not achieve the intended outcome. While citizens may protest that a policy has inflicted significant social change without consent, some governments may maintain that the overarching goal of environmental benefit outweighs social concerns. This article explores the social impact of wind energy development in Ontario, Canada’s rural communities, and suggests a greater role for social research in informing future policy development.


Keywords: Renewable energy, wind turbines, government policy, informed consent, social impact

Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Jane Wilson, Carmen M Krogh, Grace Howell. Exploring the need for government energy policy-makers to consider social impacts. International Journal of Social Research, 2017; 1:10. DOI:10.28933/ijsr-2017-11-3001


References:

1. CD Howe Institute. Ontario’s Green Energy Experience: sobering lessons for sustainable climate change policies. August 15, 2017; 2-4
2. Michael Nissenbaum, Jeff Aramini, Christopher Hanning. Effects of industrial wind turbine noise on sleep and health. Noise Health , 2012; 14: 237-243.
3. Chad Walker, Jamie Baxter. Beyond rhetoric to understanding determinants of wind turbine support and conflict in two Ontario, Canada communities. Environment and Planning, 2014;46:730-745.
4. Stewart Fast, Warren Mabee, Jamie Baxter, Tanya Christidis, Liz Driver, Stephen Hill, et al. Lessons learned from Ontario wind energy disputes. Nature Energy, 2016. DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2015.28
5. Canadian Wind Energy Association. Wind energy in Ontario. Available at: https://canwea. ca/wind-energy/ontario/
6. Fast et al, op cit.
7. Michael Trebilcock. Speaking truth to wind power. In: Jane Wilson, editor. Dirty Business: the reality of Ontario’s rush to wind power. Ottawa: Wind Concerns Ontario; 2011. P. 10.
8. Ontario Association of Food Banks. 2016. Special Report on Energy Poverty. In Hunger Report 2016. Available at: https://oafb.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Hunger-Report-Digital.pdf
9. Emmanuel Songsore, Michael Buzzelli, Jamie Baxter. Understanding developer perspectives and experiences of wind energy development in Ontario. Environment and Planning, 2017. DOI: 10.117/2399654417721931
10. Stewart Fast. NIMBYs are not the problem. Institute for Research on Public Policy, Policy Options, September 2, 2014. Available at: http://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/beautiful-data-fast
11. McGuinty vows to stop wind farm NIMBYs. Toronto Star, February 11, 2009. Available at: https://www.thestar. com/news/ontario/2009/02/11/mcguinty_vows_to_stop_windfarm_nimbys.html
12. Fast et al, op cit.
13. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. The potential health impact of wind turbines. 2010. Available at: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/common/ministry/publications/reports/wind_turbine/wind_turbine.pdf
14. Ontario, Ministry of the Environment. [no date]. Wind Farm Approval Requirements. Staff training document, provided under Freedom of Information request 2017-01697.
15. Ontario, Ministry of the Environment. 2010. WTG Complaint Response and Management Special Considerations. Noise Measurement Training presentation, West Central Region, June 2010. Provided under Freedom of Information request 2017-01697.
16. Wind Concerns Ontario. 2017. Response to wind turbine noise complaints: a report on incident records released under Freedom of Information. Available at: http://www.windconcernsontario.ca/ontario-government-failed-to-respond-to-wind-turbine-noise-reports-documents-show/
17. Huron County Health Unit. 2017. Wind turbine study. Available at: https://www.huronhealthunit.ca/reports-and-statistics/investigations/wind-turbine-study/
18. Roy Jeffery, Carmen Krogh, Brett Horner. [Commentary]. Adverse health effects of industrial wind turbines. Canadian Family Physician, 2013; 59: 473-475.
19. David Colby, Robert Dobie, Geoff Leventhall, David Lipscomb, Robert McCunney, Michael Seilo, et al. 2009. Wind turbine sound and health effects: an expert panel review. American Wind Energy Association and Canadian Wind Energy Association. Available at: http://canwea. ca/pdf/talkwind/Wind_Turbine_Sound_and_Health_Effects-Executive_Summary.pdf
20. Canadian Wind Energy Association. (2011). News release (October 10, 2011). PDF copy available.
21. US Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Air Act Title IV: Noise Pollution. Available at: https://www.epa. gov/clean-air-act-overview/clean-air-act-title-iv-noise-pollution
22. Commonwealth of Australia. 2015. Final Report of the Select Committee on Wind Turbines.
23. Stephen Cooper. 2015. Soundscape of a windfarm – the Cape Bridgewater experience. Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of America, 170th meeting. DOI: 10.1121/2.0000157
24. Health Canada. 2014. Wind turbine noise and health study. Available at: https://www.canada. ca /en/health-canada/services/environmental-workplace-health/noise/wind-turbine-noise/wind-turbine-noise-health-study-summary-results.html
25. Health Canada. 2014. Health Canada’s Wind Turbine Noise and Health Study Results Overview. PowerPoint presentation. Pages 10-11.
26. Robert McMurtry, Carmen Krogh. Diagnostic criteria for adverse health effects in the environs of wind turbines. JRSM, October 2014 Vol. 5 No. 10.
27. Grace Howell, Debbie Shubat, Carmen Krogh. 2016. Autism and the effect of introducing a new noise source into quiet rural communities: risk factor from industrial wind power generation. Available at: https://works.bepress. com/grace_howell/1/
28. Council of Canadian Academies. 2015. Understanding the evidence: wind turbine noise. Report from the Expert Panel on Wind Turbine Noise and Human Health.
29. Roy Jeffery, Carmen Krogh, Brett Horner. [Review]. Industrial wind turbines and adverse health effects. Can J Rural Medicine, 2014; 19 (1). http://www.ncbi.nim.nih. gov/pubmed/24398354
30. Songsore et al. Op cit, page 16.
31. Jamie Baxter, Rakhee Morzaria,Rachel Hirsch. A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict. Energy Policy, 2013. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.050
32. Carmen Krogh. Industrial Wind Turbine Development and Loss of Social Justice? Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 2011; 31: 321, DOI: 10.1177/0270467611412550, http://bst.sagepub. com/content/31/4/321