Research article of Journal of Plant and Environmental Research
The interactive effect of the water deficiency, gibberellic acid and proline on the growth of maize
MUSTAFA. R. AL-SHAHEEN1,2 Muaiad Hadi Ismael1
1Department of Field Crop, College of Agriculture, University of Anbar, Anbar, Iraq
2School of Bioprocess Engineering, University Malaysia Perlis, Perlis, Malaysia
A field experiment was conducted in Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysia from 15/2/2014 and 15/2/2015 two seasons. In each year, the experiments have been implemented in order to study the effect of three levels of irrigation water (25% (no stress), 50% (moderate deficit), 75% (water deficit) of field capacity), and five concentrations of GA3(0, 50, 100, 200, 300 ppm) and five concentrations of proline (0, 100, 200, 300, 400 ppm) on the yield and productivity of maize.The results showed a significant influence of sprayed GA3on the maize leaves, where excellence sprayed 300ppm GA3 with a high rate of all the study characteristics with sprayed 300ppm of gibberellic acid except cobs per plant. The results of the interaction between GA3and water deficit showed the clear influence of water deficit in reducing all characteristics of study where excelled the interactions (300ppm GA3 and 25% from field capacity) with a high rate of majority study characteristics, but these increases were not sufficient. Concluded from the results of the study great positive impact of sprayed proline on the all of the growth characteristics, it characterizes the concentration of 400ppm with the highest rate of majority study characteristics. The study results showed into increased the rate of protein, chlorophyll content, and oil, with sprayed 400ppm of proline.
Keywords: water stress, proline, gibberellic acid, corn growth, irrigation level
How to cite this article:
MUSTAFA and Ismael. The interactive effect of the water deficiency, gibberellic acid and proline on the growth of maize. Journal of Plant and Environmental Research, 2016,1:4. DOI:10.28933/mustafa-and-ismael-jper-201604
1. Gustafson, E.J. and B.R. Sturtevant, Modeling forest mortality caused by drought stress: implications for climate change. Ecosystems, 2013. 16(1): p. 60-74.
2. Van Loon, A., et al., How climate seasonality modifies drought duration and deficit. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2014. 119(8): p. 4640-4656.
3. Chowdhury, S. and M. Al-Zahrani, Characterizing water resources and trends of sector wise water consumptions in Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 2015. 27(1): p. 68-82.
4. Milano, M., et al., Modeling the current and future capacity of water resources to meet water demands in the Ebro basin. Journal of hydrology, 2013. 500: p. 114-126.
5. Caron, J., R. Heinse, and S. Charpentier, Organic Materials Used in Agriculture, Horticulture, Reconstructed Soils, and Filtering Applications. Vadose Zone Journal, 2015. 14(6).
6. Landon, J.R., Booker tropical soil manual: a handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. 2014: Routledge.
7. Sheoran, I.S., et al., Proteome profile and functional classification of proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana (Landsberg erecta) mature pollen. Sexual Plant Reproduction, 2006. 19(4): p. 185-196.
8. Molazem, D., et al., Measuring chlorophyll content in corn leaves at soil salinity conditions by using spectrophotometer and its correlation with plant yield. Life Science Journal, 2012. 9(4).
9. Al-Dulaimi, R.I., N. Ismail, and M.H. Ibrahim, Responses of grofth of lady’s fingers (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) to different treatments methods of dairy wastewater. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 2014. 21(1).
10.Bates, L., R. Waldren, and I. Teare, Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil, 1973. 39(1): p. 205-207.
11.Marín Velázquez, J.A., et al., Determination of proline concentration, an abiotic stress marker, in root exudates of excised root cultures of fruit tree rootstocks under salt stress. 2010.