Research article of American Journal of Scientific Research and Essays
Ca-Markov Model for Simulating Land Use Land Cover Dynamics in Rufiji Delta of Tanzania
Job Asheri Chaula
School of Earth Science, Real Estate, Business and Informatics, Department of Computer Systems and Mathematics, Ardhi University-Tanzania
Sustainable management and resilience of ecosystems and their different services from land, water, biodiversity and forests has been highlighted as a means to address environmental degradation in Tanzania. On contrary, there is in adequate information to aid sustainable management of fragile natural resources such as Rufiji Delta. To address the limitation this research was carried out using Landsat data for appraising and simulating the future situation of Rufiji Delta using CA-Markov model. Maximum Likelihood Classification algorithm in ERDAS Imagine software was used for Landsat image classification and accuracy assessment for year 1998, 2008 and 2018 while Ca-Markov model of IDRIS Selva software was used for quantification of LULC change and simulation, correspondingly. The classification results of four different study periods have depicted the quantity land use land cover status in year 1998, 2008 and 2018. In year 1998 the impervious land cover was the largest class with 53413.40 ha (35.74% composition), followed by water bodies with 42506.10 ha (28.44% composition) while mangrove forest and non-mangrove vegetation consisted of 38060.40 ha (25.47 % composition) and 15468.50 ha (10.35% composition), correspondingly. In year 2018 the impervious land cover increased to 60759.70 ha (40.66% composition) while mangrove forest and non-mangrove vegetation consisted of 35062.2 ha (23.46% composition) and 23019.2 ha (15.40% composition), correspondingly. Water bodies declined to 30607.10 ha (20.48% composition) following the consumption of water in hydro-electrical and agricultural expansion proximal to the Rufiji Delta. In year 2048 a notable decline to about 29757.07 ha, (18.91%), 34891.44 ha (21.35were recorded for mangrove forest and water bodies, correspondingly. The ongoing harvesting and clearing of mangrove forest for construction and other local use purpose. Substantial increase in area non-mangrove vegetation and impervious land cover was estimated to 22507.20 ha and 62292.84 ha, correspondingly. Agro afforestation, forestry farming, Agro-Zonation, adoption of AFOLU and LULCF programs are highly recommended in area proximal to Rufiji Delta.
Keywords: LULC dynamics; Simulation of LULC; LULC modelling
How to cite this article:
Job Asheri Chaula.Ca-Markov Model for Simulating Land Use Land Cover Dynamics in Rufiji Delta of Tanzania. American Journal of Scientific Research and Essays, 2019 4:27. DOI:10.28933/ajsre-2019-07-1305
1. Araya, Y. H., & Cabral, P. (2010). Analysis and modeling of urban land cover change in Setúbal and Sesimbra, Portugal. Remote Sensing, 2(6), 1549–1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2061549
2. Bruce, C. M., & Hilbert, D. W. (2004). Pre-processing Methodology for Application to Landsat TM/ETM+ Imagery of the Wet Tropics. Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management. Rainforest CRC, Cairns., 44 pp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/468147
3. Eastman, J. R. (2012). IDRISI Selva Tutorial. Clark Universtity, Manual Ver(January).
4. Ghosh, P., Mukhopadhyay, A., Chanda, A., Mondal, P., Akhand, A., Mukherjee, S., … Ghosh, T. (2017). Remote Sensing Applications : Society and Environment Application of Cellular automata and Markov-chain model in geospatial environmental modeling- A review. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 5(January), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.01.005
5. Hamdy, O., Zhao, S., A. Salheen, M., & Eid, Y. Y. (2017). Analyses the Driving Forces for Urban Growth by Using IDRISI®Selva Models Abouelreesh – Aswan as a Case Study. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2017.V9.975
6. Houet, T., Hubert-moy, L., Houet, T., Modeling, L. H., & States, F. (2007). Modeling and projecting land-use and land-cover changes with Cellular Automaton in considering landscape trajectories To cite this version : HAL Id : halshs-00195847 TRAJECTORIES : AN IMPROVEMENT FOR SIMULATION OF PLAUSIBLE.
7. Hyandye, C., & Martz, L. W. (2017). A Markovian and cellular automata land-use change predictive model of the Usangu Catchment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1259675
8. Landgrebe, D. (1997). The Evolution of Landsat Data Analysis 1, 63(7), 859–867.
9. Ma, C., Zhang, G. Y., Zhang, X. C., Zhao, Y. J., & Li, H. Y. (2012). Application of Markov model in wetland change dynamics in Tianjin Coastal Area, China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13(2011), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.024
10. Mahmoud, M. I. (2016). Integrating Geoinformation and Socioeconomic Data for Assessing Urban Land-use Vulnerability to Potential Climate-change Impacts of Abuja By, (May).
11. Memarian, H., Kumar Balasundram, S., Bin Talib, J., Teh Boon Sung, C., Mohd Sood, A., & Abbaspour, K. (2012). Validation of CA-Markov for Simulation of Land Use and Cover Change in the Langat Basin, Malaysia. Journal of Geographic Information System, 04(06), 542–554. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2012.46059
12. Mirhosseini, S. M., Jamali, A. A., & Hosseini, S. Z. (2016). Investigating and Predicting the Extension of Dunes Using Land Change Modeler ( LCM ) in the North West of Yazd , Iran, 1, 76–90.
13. Mwansasu, S. (2016). Causes and Perceptions of Environmental Change in the Mangroves of Rufiji Delta , Tanzania Implications for Sustainable Livelihood and Conservation.
14. Paul, S. S. (2013). Analysis of land use and land cover change in kiskatinaw river watershed: a remote sensing, gis & modeling approach.
15. Phiri, D., & Morgenroth, J. (2017). Developments in Landsat land cover classification methods: A review. Remote Sensing, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090967
16. Putra, U. (2017). APPLICATION OF CA-MARKOV MODEL AND LAND USE / LAND COVER CHANGES IN MALACCA RIVER WATERSHED , 15(4), 605–622.
17. Rwanga, S. S., & Ndambuki, J. M. (1991). Accuracy Assessment of Land Use / Land Cover Classification Using Remote Sensing and GIS, 2017, 611–622. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.84033
18. Shapiro AC, Trettin CC, Küchly H, Alavinapanah S, Bandeira S (2015) The mangroves of the Zambezi
Delta: Increase in extent observed via satellite from 1994 to 2013. Remote Sensing, 15 pp
19. USGS. (2016). Landsat – Earth observation satellites: Fact Sheet, 2020(August 2016), 4. https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20153081
20. Weng, Q. (2002). Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 64(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0509.
21. Wagner G M, Sallema-Mtui R (2016) The Rufiji Estuary: Climate change, anthropogenic pressures, vulnerability assessment and adaptive management strategies. Western Indian Ocean, Estuaries of the World [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-25370-1-12]
22. Yasmine Megahed *, Pedro Cabral, J. S. and M. C. (2015). Geo-Information Greater Cairo Region — Egypt, 1750–1769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4031750
23. Young, N. E., Anderson, R. S., Chignell, S. M., Vorster, A. G., Lawrence, R., & Evangelista, P. H. (2017). A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing. Ecology, 98(4), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1730
24. Zhigang Cheng, & Shuangping Cao. (2011). Markov processes in modeling land use and land cover change in Tibetan Plateau. 2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, 72(158), 457–459. https://doi.org/10.1109/RSETE.2011.5964312