Research Article of American Journal of Surgical Research and Reviews
A comparative study between laparoscopic hernia repair and open herniotomy of inguinal hernia in paediatric age group: A prospective randomized controlled study
Dr.Arti Mitra1, Dr.Unmed Chandak1, Dr.Yuvraj Pawaskar1*, Dr.Shiv Kumar Sahu1, Dr. Sanskriti Sinha1, Dr. Prasad Bansod1, Dr. Nilesh Nagdeve2, Dr. Akanksha Waldia3
1Department of General surgery, Government Medical College and Hospital Nagpur, Maharashtra, India-440003; 2Department of Paediatric surgery, Government Medical College and Hospital Nagpur, Maharashtra, India-440003;3MBBS Intern, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India-440012
Background: Inguinal hernia in children remains one of the most common congenital anomaly observed by surgeons. Prompt diagnosis and early treatment of the inguinal hernia continues to be the mainstay to avoid the complications. The present study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair and open herniotomy of inguinal hernia in paediatric age group.
Method: A total 104 healthy children of age <12 years diagnosed with inguinal hernias were alternately randomized into two equal groups, 52 patients were treated by laparoscopic method and 52 patients were treated by open herniotomy method. The outcome of two techniques compare were operative time, recovery and discharge within 24 hours, post-operative pain assessment, cosmesis and complications.
Results: The mean operating time for open herniotomy was significantly less (36.69) as compared to that for laparoscopic hernia group (66.98). Recovery and discharge within 24 hours of patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair were significantly more (78.85%) than the open herniotomy group (57.69%). The CHIPPS for post-operative pain assessment were 5.28 for open herniotomy Vs 5.07 for laparoscopic hernia repair. FLACC tool for postoperative and periprocedural pain assessment was 4.75 for open hernioromy Vs 4.61 for laparoscopic hernia repair. The excellent cosmesis after laparoscopic procedure, whereas good cosmesis after open procedure among all subjects from respective groups. The complications including scrotal edema, erythema, hydrocele and recurrence were not significantly different in the two groups.
Conclusion: The study concludes that the well performed conventional herniotomy yields results similar to those of laparoscopic repair.
Keywords: Inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic hernia repair, Open herniotomy, Paediatric, Cosmesis, Recovery
How to cite this article:
Arti Mitra, Unmed Chandak, Yuvraj Pawaskar, Shiv Kumar Sahu, Sanskriti Sinha, Prasad Bansod, Nilesh Nagdeve, Akanksha Waldia. A comparative study between laparoscopic hernia repair and open herniotomy of inguinal hernia in paediatric age group: A prospective randomized controlled study. American Journal of Surgical Research and Reviews, 2021; 4:24.. DOI:10.28933/ajsrr-2021-05-2505
1. Zhu LL, Xu WJ, Liu JB, Huang X, Lv ZB. Com-parison of laparoscopic hernia repair and open herniotomy in children: a retrospective cohort study. Hernia. 2017;21(3):417–23.
2. Scherer LR 3rd, Grosfeld JL. Inguinal hernia and umbilical anomalies. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1993;40(6):1121-31.
3. Skinner MA, Grosfeld JL. Inguinal and umbilical hernia repair in infants and children. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73(3):439-49.
4. Zhou X, Qi X, Jiang B, Sha Y, Song D. Tran-sumbilical endoscopic technique for complete closure of inguinal hernias in female pediatric pa-tients. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13(1):41–4.
5. Zhou J, Chen X, Jiang T. Pediatric inguinal hernia treated by single-port laparoscopic water injection hernia crochet needle. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020;15(1):239–44.
6. Davies DA, Rideout DA, Clarke SA. The Interna-
7. tional Pediatric Endosurgery Group Evi-dence-Based Guideline on Minimal Access Ap-proaches to the Operative Management of In-guinal Hernia in Children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(2):221–7.
8. Xiao Y. Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernias repair in girls: using an epidural needle assisted by a towel forceps. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):139.
9. Okunribido O. Ladipo J.K. and Ajao O.G. “Inguinal hernia in paediatric age group, Ibadan experi-ence”, East Afr. Med. J.,1992; 69 (6): 347-348.
10. Adesunkanmi A.R., Adejuyigbe O: “Prognostic factors in childhood inguinal hernia at Wesley Guild Hospital,Nigeria”, East. Afr.Med. J, 1990;76 (3) :144-147.
11. Saranga Bharathi R, Arora M, Baskaran V. Pedi-atric inguinal hernia: laparoscopic versus open surgery. JSLS. 2008 Sep;12(3):277–81.
12. Grosfeld J .L Weber T.R- “congenital abdominal wall defects” current problems in surgry 1982; 19;159.
13. F Ralph M. Larsen and Nashville Tenn: “Inguinal Hernia in Infancy and Early childhood”, Annals of Surgery; 1949;25:307-328.
14. Gilbert AI: Inguinal hernia repair: biomaterials and sutureless repair. Perspective Gen Surg. 1991; 2:113-129.
15. Wills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic chol-ecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2000;87:273–284.
16. Elekiabi, Omar & Eraky, Mohamed & Abdelhady, Waleed & Sallam, Ahmed & Gertallah, Loay. A Comparative Study between Laparoscopic Repair and Open Repair of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia; Outcomes and Benefits. Acta Scientific Paediat-rics 2019; 2:03-08.
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.