Evaluation of undergraduate Logistics & Transportation Management curriculum change from traditional lecturing to student-centered Problem-Based Learning (PBL) active learning environment

Evaluation of undergraduate Logistics & Transportation Management curriculum change from traditional lecturing to student-centered Problem-Based Learning (PBL) active learning environment

Leovani Marcial Guimarães and Renato da Silva Lima

Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management (IEPG), Federal University of Itajuba (UNIFEI) – Brazil; Address: Av. B P S, 1303 – Pinheirinho, Itajubá – MG – Brazil.

Problem This paper presents the outcomes of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) methodology implementation in the undergraduate Logistics & Transportation (L&T) Management course at the Federal University of Itajubá (UNIFEI), Brazil. The research explores a curriculum change evaluation by using Survey data from two stages, in two semesters of the L&T course, with different PBL scenarios and students. L&T course addressed several concepts of Logistics Management and the PBL approach enpowered students to self-learning, citical thinking, social and process skills. It was demonstrated that the majority of the students, over 91%, appreciated the benefits of PBL based curriculum in both semesters, with positive evaluation in all course dimensions. To support the conclusions of the study, special attention was given to the development of the questionnaires. The first stage, the pilot questionnaire, had a set of 21 scaled and structured questions, covering the course concepts and learning objectives. The second stage questionnaire was redesigned to a new set of 15 questions, modeled to three constructs by Factor Analysis, keeping up with the reliability and validity requirements.

Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Survey, curriculum change, Logistics & Transportation Management, Industrial Engineering.

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:

Leovani Marcial Guimarães and Renato da Silva Lima. Evaluation of undergraduate Logistics & Transportation Management curriculum change from traditional lecturing to student-centered Problem-Based Learning (PBL) active learning environment. American Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 2020, 3:14.


1. Barrows H.S. 1985. How to design a problem-based curriculum for preclinical years: Springer Series on Medical Education. Springer Pub Co, April 1, 1985., ISBN-10: 0826149006, ISBN-13: 978-0826149008, New York.
2. Barrows H.S. 1986. “A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods”. Medical Education 20(6): 481–486.
3. Boud D. J., and G. I. Feletti. 1997. The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd ed.). Oxon [England]: Routledge, 1997, ISBN 9780749425609, London.
4. Cardoso I. M., and R .S. Lima. 2012. “Métodos ativos de aprendizagem: o uso do aprendizado baseado em problemas no ensino de Logística e Transportes”. Transportes 20(3): 79-88.
5. Cronbach L. J. 1951. “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests”. Psychometrika 16(3): 297–334.
6. Da Silva A. N. R, N. P. Kuri, and A. Casale. 2012. “PBL and B-Learning for Civil Engineering Students in a Transportation Course”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice 138(4): 305-313. DOI: 10.1061/ (ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000115.
7. Dickhaus T., and T. Royen. 2015. “A survey on multivariate chi-square distributions and their applications in testing multiple hypotheses”. Statistics 49(2): 427-454. DOI: 10.1080/02331888.2014.993639.
8. Forza C. 2002. “Survey Research in Operations Management: a process-based perspective”. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22(2): 152-194.
9. Fruchter R. 1999. “A/E/C Teamwork: A Collaborative Design and Learning Space”. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 13(4): 261-269.
10. Garnjost P., and S. Brown. 2018. “Undergraduate business students’ perceptions of learning outcomes in problem-based and faculty centered courses”. International Journal of Management Education 16(1): 121-130.
11. Kaiser H.F. 1958. “The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis”. Psychometrika 23(3): 187-200.
12. Kanet, J., and M. Barut. 2003. “Problem-Based Learning for Production and Operations Management”. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 1, 99-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.00007
13. Koromyslova K., and B. Garry. 2016. “Problem-based Learning in a Supply Chain Management Course”. American Society for Engineering Education, Paper ID #14739.
14. Kruskal W. H., and W. A. Wallis. 1952. “Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47(260): 583–621. DOI:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441.
15. Gageiro J. N., and M. H. Pestana. 2003. “Análise de dados para ciências sociais: a complementaridade do SPSS”, Edições Sílabo. Lisboa, 2003.
16. Grasas A., and H. Ramalhinho. 2016. “Teaching distribution planning: a problem-based learning approach”. The International Journal of Logistics Management 27(2): 377-394.
17. Guimarães L. M., R. J. Cerqueira, and J. L. Noronha. 2016. “PBL (Problem Based Learning) methodology application proposal in a production engineering under graduation course discipline at Itajubá Federal University (Unifei)”. International Journal of Active Learning 1(1): 35-55. DOI: 10.15202/2526-2254.2016v1n1p35.
18. Hmelo-Silver C. E. 2004. “Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn?”. Educational Psychology Review 16(3): 235-266.
19. Kanet J., and M. Stößlein. 2008. “Using a Supply Chain Game to Effect Problem-Based Learning in an Undergraduate Operations Management Program”. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 6(2): 287-295.
20. Likert R. 1932. “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes”. Archives of Psychology 22(140): 1–55.
21. Norman G. R., and H. G. Schmidt. 1992. “The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence”. Academic Medicine 67(9): 557-565.
22. Prado da Silva C., H. Fontenele, and A. R. da Silva. 2015. “Transportation Engineering Education for Undergraduate Students: Competencies, Skills, Teaching-Learning, and Evaluation”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 141(3): 05014006-1 – 05014006-9.
23. Savery J. R 2006. “Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions”. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1(1): 9-20.
24. Seman L. O., R. Hausmann, and E. C. Bezerra. 2018. “On the students’ perceptions of the knowledge formation when submitted to a Project-Based Learning environment using web applications”. Computers & Education 117: 16-30. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.001
25. Silva Filho O., and R. Calado. 2013. “Learning supply chain management by PBL with A3 report support”. Paper published in: IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline) 6(1): pp. 471-477.
26. Tick A. 2007. “Use of Problem-based learning in teaching Logistics and International Operations”. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Logistics and Industrial Informatics pp. 81-85, Wildau, Germany.
27. Tortorella G., and P. A. Cauchick-Miguel. 2017. “An initiative for integrating problem-based learning into a lean manufacturing course of an industrial engineering graduate program”. Production 27(spe): 1-14. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6513.224716.
28. Yong A. G., and S. A. Pearce. 2013. “Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis”. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 9(2): 79-94. DOI:10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079.
29. Zolin R., R. Fruchter, and R. Levitt. 2003. “Realism and control: problem-based learning programs as a data source for work-related research”. International Journal of Engineering Education 19(3): 788-798.

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details).

This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.