The impact of gender diversity in the boardroom on dividend policy: evidence from Swedish listed companies


The impact of gender diversity in the boardroom on dividend policy: evidence from Swedish listed companies

(This Article has been retracted from Global journal of Economics and Business Administration. Do not use it for any purposes)


Xing Zhao

Tianjin University of Finance and Economics Pearl River College


Global-journal-of-Economics-and-Business-Administration

In recent times, shareholders, regulators and researchers have increasingly shown concern about the gender diversity in the boardroom and dividend policy. Many researches show that women in the board can better represent the shareholders’ interest. There are different findings in the previous literature regarding the relationship between gender diversity in the boardroom and dividend policy in Sweden. This paper aims at examining the relationship between women directors in the boardroom and dividend payout, in additional, examining the components of women directors in the boardroom, that is, how the proportion of women directors, the proportion of independent women directors, the proportion of executive women directors and the proportion of institutional women directors affect dividend payout.
The study analyzed the 273 companies currently listed on the Nasdaq OMX Stockholm Stock during the period 2011 and 2015. Three different two-way fixed effects models and regression analysis are used to obtain the required data. Our findings indicated that there is a positive significant relationship between the percentage of women directors, independent women directors and dividend payout in three different models. By the regression result of these three models, there is no significant relationship between the proportion of executive women directors/institutional women directors and dividend payout. Thus, our result confirms that the proportion of women directors and independent women directors in the boardroom has effect on the dividend payout. The empirical evidence on this study can support Swedish board gender quota proposal, which requires at least 40% of their board members of public traded companies are female by 2019.


Keywords: Women directors; Independent women directors; Executive women directors; Institutional women directors; Dividend payout; Swedish board gender quot

Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Xing Zhao. The impact of gender diversity in the boardroom on dividend policy:evidence from Swedish listed companies. Global journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2018, 3:16. DOI:10.28933/gjeba-2018-12-1206


References:

1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94(2), 291-309.
2. Al-Najjar, B., & Hussainey, K. (2009). The association between dividend payout and outside directorships. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 4-19.
3. Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1(1), 101-124.
4. Byoun, S., Chang, K., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). Does corporate board diversity affect corporate payout policy?. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45(1), 48-101.
5. Catalyst (2004), The Bottom Line: Connecting corporate performance and genderdiversity. Catalyst: New York, NY.
6. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of business ethics, 83(3), 435-451.
7. Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414.
8. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 38(1), 33-53.
9. Dezso, C. L., and Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.
10. Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.
11. Eckbo, B. E., & Verma, S. (1994). Managerial shareownership, voting power, and cash dividend policy. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1(1), 33-62.
12. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate governance: An international review, 11(2), 102-111.
13. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
14. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate finance, 11(1), 85-106.
15. Fenn, G. W., & Liang, N. (2001). Corporate payout policy and managerial stock incentives. Journal of financial economics, 60(1), 45-72.
16. Francis, B., Hasan, I., Park, J. C., & Wu, Q. (2015). Gender differences in financial reporting decision making: Evidence from accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1285-1318.
17. Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1980). Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 42-64.
18. Gulzar, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance characteristics and earnings management: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 1(1), 133.
19. Hedensteda, J. S., & Raaballeb, J. (2007). Dividend determinants in Denmark.
20. Hewa Wellalage, N., Fouzi, F., Gaoxiang, W., & Basyith, A. (2014). Corporate governance and cash dividend policy: evidence from Chinese IPOs. Malaysian Accounting Review, 13(1), 109-128.
21. Huse, M., & Grethe Solberg, A. (2006). Gender-related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2), 113-130.
22. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers.
23. Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2).
24. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
25. Joy, L. (2008). Women board directors in the United States: An eleven year retrospective. Women on corporate boards of directors: International research and practice, 15-23.
26. Kandel, E., & Lazear, E. P. (1992). Peer pressure and partnerships. Journal of political Economy, 801-817.
27. Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Raheja, C. G. (2009, February). Benefits of focus vs. heterogeneity: An analysis of corporate boards. In AFA 2010 Atlanta Meetings Paper.
28. Krafft, J., Qu, Y., Quatraro, F., & Ravix, J. L. (2013). Corporate governance, value and performance of firms: New empirical results on convergence from a large international database. Industrial and Corporate Change, dtt007.
29. Low, D. C. M., Roberts, H., and Whiting, R. H. (2015). Board gender diversity and firm performance: empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35(A), 381-401.
30. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women directors’ contribution to board decision‐ making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16-29.
31. Nguyen, H., & Faff, R. (2007). Impact of board size and board diversity on firm value: Australian evidence. Corporate ownership and control, 4(2), 24-32.
32. Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Bel-Oms, I. (2016). The board of directors and dividend policy: the effect of gender diversity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(3), 523-547.
33. Qi, B., & Tian, G. (2012). The impact of Audit Committees’ personal characteristics on earnings management: Evidence from China. Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(6), 1331.
34. Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404-413.
35. Rozeff, M. S. (1982). Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. Journal of financial Research, 5(3), 249-259.
36. Short, H., Zhang, H., & Keasey, K. (2002). The link between dividend policy and institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(2), 105-122.
37. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of managerial issues, 355-372.
38. Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610-1644.c
39. Tarr-Whelan, L. (2009). Women lead the way: Your guide to stepping up to leadership and changing the world. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
40. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate governance: an international review, 17(3), 320-337.
41. Van Pelt, T. (2013). The effect of board characteristics on dividend policy. Tilburg University, 1-62.
42. Xing Zhao. (2016). The impact of gender diversity on boards on dividend policy: evidence from Swedish listed companies. Course name, Advanced financial theory. Stockholm Business School.
43. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211.
44. StatisticsSweden,http://www.scb.se/sv_/Hittastatistik/Temaomraden/Jamstalldhet_vt2015/Indikatorer/Excel—Makt-och-inflytande/