EVALUATION OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUML.) GENOTYPES FOR YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS


EVALUATION OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUML.) GENOTYPES FOR YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS


Kedir Yimam*, Aliyi Robsa, Gizachew Yilma and Temesgen Abo

Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center


The production and productivity of field pea in Ethiopia is constrained by low-yielding po-tential of land race, susceptibility to diseases like powdery mildew and Ascochyta blight/spot as well as a biotic stresses like frost and soil acidity. The field experiment was conducted in 2018/19 main cropping season at two locations using simple lattice design to evaluate the genetic variability and performance of forty nine field pea genotypes for yield ad yield attributing traits. The combined/pooled / analysis of variance revealed highly sig-nificant (P≤0.01) to significant (P≤0.05) differences among genotypes observed for all traits under study except for number of seeds pod -1 . The seed yield ranged from 1955 to 5997 kg ha-1 with a mean of 3803 kg across the two locations. Two genotypes PDFPT-BEK and P-313-053 were relatively high yielder over the two locations. The genotypic (GCV) and phenotypic (PCV) coefficient of variation (GCV) ranged from (1.07%) to (22.40%) and (1.22%) to (28.18% for days to maturity and grain yield, respectively for combined analyses. The PCV values were relatively greater than GCV in magnitude for all traits, of which significantly higher PCV than GCV values observed for number of pods per plant, Stand count, powdery mildew and ascocayta blight, but insignificant differences be-tween PCV and GCV values observed for days to flowering, days to maturity, plant height, 1000 seed weight, and grain yield. Broad sense heritability ranged from 23.66% to 90.73 %. The genetic advance as percentage of mean (GAM) varied from 1.92% to 36.73% .Higher heritability (H2) coupled with high GAM observed for grain yield per ha and Higher herita-bility (H2) coupled with Moderate or relatively high value of GAM in plant height and seed size. Therefore, improvement of these traits could be done through selection of genotypes based on the phenotypic performance.


Keywords: Broad sense heritability, genetic advance, genotypic coefficient of variation, phenotypic coefficient of variation

Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Kedir Yimam, Aliyi Robsa, Gizachew Yilma and Temesgen Abo. EVALUATION OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUML.) GENOTYPES FOR YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS. Global journal of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2020,1:4


References:

1. Ali A, Khan S, Asad MA (2002). Drought tolerance in wheat: Genetic variation and heritability for growth and ion relations. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 1: 420-422.
2. Allard RW (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York.
3. Baye B, Ravishankar R, Singh H (2005). Variability and association of tuber yield and related traits in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science, 18: 103–121.
4. Benti O and Yohannis P (2017). Genetic variability and association among agronomic characters in selected field pea (Pisumsativum L.) genotypes at Bale Zone, Sinana Research Center, Oromia. InternationalJournal of Genetics and Genomics, 5(6): 63–75.
5. Burton GW, Devance EH (1953). Estimation of heritability in tall Festuca (Festucaarudindces) from replicated colonial material . Agronomy Journal, 45 :78-481.
6. CSA (Central Statistical Authority). 2018. Agricultural sample survey 2009/10. Report on area and production of major crops private peasant holdings, Meher Season. Addis Ababa. Statistical Bulletin no. 586. Volume 1.
7. Deshmukh SN, Basu MS, Reddy PS (1986). Genetic variability, character association and path coefficient analysis of quantitative traits in Virginia bunch varieties of groundnut. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 56: 515-518.
8. Duncan BD (1955). Multiple Range Test and Multiple F. test.Biometrics,11: 1-42.
9. Elangovan M, Kiran Babu P, Seetharama N (2014). Genetic diversity and heritability characters associated in sweet sorghum [Sorghumbicolor (L.) Moench]. Journal of Sugar Technology, 16(2): 200-210.
10. Falconer DS, Mackay FC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, New York.
11. FAOSTAT (2017). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize.
12. Gemechu K, Mussa J, Tezera W, Getnet D (2005). Extent and pattern of genetic diversity of morpho-agronomic traits in Ethiopian highland pulse landraces. 1 in Field pea (Pisumsativum L.). Genetic Resource and Crop Evolution ,52: 539-549.
13. Hartley HO (1950). The maximum F-ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variance. Biometrika, 37(3/4): 308 312.
14. Johnson HW, Robinson HF. Comstock RE (1955). Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in soybean and other implications in selection. Agronomy Journal,47: 477-483.
15. Kebebew A, Gina C, Dejene G, Rizqah K, Solomon CH (2015). Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter].Frontiers of Plant Science ,6(177): 1-13.
16. Kumar D, Malik S, Singh SK, Kumar M (2013). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for seed yield and yield components in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Vegetos, 26(1): 182-184.
17. Manju PR, Sreelathakumary I (2002). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in hot chilli (Capsicum chinense JACQ.) .Journal of Tropical Agriculture ,40: 4-6.
18. Messiaen CM, Seif AA, Jarso M, Keneni GA (2006). Pisum sativum L. internet record from PROTA4U. In. Brink M, Belay G (Eds.), PROTA: Plant Resources of Tropical Africa, Wageningen, Netherlands.
19. Million F ( 2012). Variablity,Heriatablity and Associattion of Some Morpho-Agronomic Traits in Field Pea (Pisium Sativum L.) Genotypes.Pakistan Journal of Bilogical Science, 15 (80);358-366.
20. Mussa J, Tezera W, Gemechu K (2006). Review of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genetics and breeding research in Ethiopia: A review. In. Kemal A, Gemechu K, Seid A, Malhotra R, Beniwal S (Eds.), Food and Forage Legumes of Ethiopia: Progress and Prospects. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 67-79.
21. Peter MV, William GH, Naomi RW (2008). Heritability in the genomics era- concepts and misconceptions. Nature Review Genetics, 9: 255-266.
22. Rafiul A, Firoz M, Mir AR (2017). Genetic diversity, correlation and path analysis for yield and yield components of pea (Pisumsativum L .). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13 (1): 11-16.
23. Ranjan S, Kumar M, Pandey SS (2006). Genetic variability in pea (Pisumsativum L.). Legume Research, 29(4): 311-312.
24. Sahile S, Ahmed S, Fininsa C, Abang M and Sakhuja PK (2008). Survey of chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) disease of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and assessment of factors influencing disease epidemics in northern Ethiopia. Crop Protection, 27: 1457-1463.
25. SAS (Statistical Analysis System).2002 .System Analysis Software version 9.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
26. Saxesena RR, Vidyakar V, Sishwakarma MK, Yadav PS, Meena ML, et al. (2014). Genetic variability and heritability analysis for some quantitative traits in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Supplement on Genetics and Plant Breeding ,9(2): 895-898.
27. Singh BD (2001). Plant breeding: Principles and Methods. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
28. Singh BK, Deka BC, Ramakrishna Y (2014). Genetic variability, heritability and interrelationships in pole-type French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, India, Section B Biological Science,84(3): 587-592.
29. Singh RK, Chaudhary BD (1985). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, PP. 318.
30. Tamene TT (2017). Genetic Variation , Heritability , And Advances From Selection In Elite Breeding Materials Of Field Pea ( Pisum Sativum L .). Agrecultural Research and Technology,8(4):555740. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2017.08.555744.
31. Teshome E,and Tegegn A (2017). Comparative Study of Powdery Mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) Disease Severity and Its Effect on Yield and Yield Components of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the Southeastern Oromia, Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Pathol ogy and Microbiology, 8: 410.doi: 10.4172/2157-7471.1000410
32. Yasin G, Mathewos A (2014). Evaluation of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes performance for yield and yield components at five growing environments of southern Ethiopia. Current Research in Agricultural Sciences, 1(3):65-76.


Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details).



This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.