Case Report of International Journal of Case Reports
Endodontic Management Of C-shaped Root Canal Followed By a Post Less Core and Crown-a Case Report
Dr. Madhuri A. PatilA, Dr. Amol S. PatilB
AMDS, Sr lecturer, Department of Conservative dentistry and Endodontics
BMDS, Sr lecturer, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry
C-shaped canal is one of the most difficult situations with which the dentist is confronted during endodontic treatment of teeth. Recognition of unusual variation in the canal configuration is critical because it has been established that the root with a single tapering canal and apical foramen is the exception rather than rule. The early recognition of these configurations facilitates cleaning, shaping and obturation of the root canal system. “C” configuration, which is an important anatomic variation, presents a thin fin connecting the root canals. In this case report we have discussed the successful management of C-shaped canal (Melton’s category II) in mandibular second molar diagnosed by using cone-beam computed tomography and operating microscope and also used self-adjusting file (SAF), sonic irrigation and thermoplasticized gutta percha obturating technique. Endocrown-type restorations are single prostheses fabricated from reinforced ceramics that can be acid etched, indicated for endodontically treated molar teeth that have significant loss of coronal structure. Endocrowns are formed from a monoblock containing the coronal portion integrated into the apical projection that fills the pulp chamber space, and possibly the root canal entrances. A endocrown-type restoration was fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.Max) in a mandibular second molar with extensive lingual destruction.
Keywords: C-shaped canal, Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), Endoactivator, Endocrown, Melton’s Classification, self-adjusting file (SAF), Rely X Unicem resin cement, Thermoplasticized gutta percha technique.
How to cite this article:
Madhuri A. Patil and Amol S. Patil. Endodontic Management Of C-shaped Root Canal Followed By a Post Less Core and Crown-a Case Report. International Journal of Case Reports, 2019 4:91
1. Kala M, Rita C, Ena L, Shaktidar PR. C shaped canal configuration: a diagnostic dilemma. Archives of Oral Sciences & Research. 2011;1(2):79-83.
2. Raisingani D, Gupta S, Mital P, Khullar P. Anatomic and Diagnostic Challenges of C-Shaped Root Canal System. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.2014;7(1):35-39.
3. Kadam NS, Ataide IN. Management of C‑shaped canals: Two case reports. Journal of orofacial sciences2013;5(1):37-41.
4. Uppin VM, Sarangi P, Satapathy S, Mohanty S. Endodontic management of C-shaped root canal in mandibular second molar: A Case Report. J Res Adv Dent. 2014;3(3):152-55.
5. Kirilova J, Pirinska ST. C-shaped configuration of the root canal system – problems and solutions. J of IMAB.2014;20(1):504-09.
6. Tzimas K, Tsiafitsa M, Gerasimou P, Tsitrou E. Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases. Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(4):1-9.
7. Imen D, Zohra N, Jilani S, Belhassen H and Mounir C. Endocrown: A Reliable Alternative to Restorate RCT Molar! – Two Case Reports. Advances in dentistry and oral health 2018;9(5):1-6.
8. Schilinburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE (1997) Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Books, Chicago, USA.
9. Kato A, Ziegler A, Higuchi N, Nakata K, Nakamura H and Ohno N. Aetiology, incidence and morphology of the C-shaped root canal system and its impact on clinical endodontics. International endodontic journal.2014;47:1012-33.
10. Ravichandra, Harikumar. C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. Indian journal of dental advancements. 2010;2(1):156-59.
11. Gade V, Lokade J, Tibdewal G, Mankar N, Gade J, Wankhade S. C- shaped root canal in mandibular second molar diagnosed using cone beam computed tomography– two case reports. IOSR Journal of dental and medical sciences.2013;11(3):16-19.
12. Melton DS, Krell KV and Fuller MW. Anatomical and histological features of C- shaped canals in mandibular second molars. J Endodon.1991,17: 384-8
13. Ruddle CJ. Endodontic advancements game changing technologies. Advanced endodontics 2009:1-4.
14. Gu Lisha, Kim JR, Lin J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigation agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009;35(6):791-804.
15. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The Endocrown: An Alternative Approach for Restoring Extensively Damaged Molars. JERD2013;25(6):383-90.
16. Fages M, Bennasar B. The Endocrown: A Different Type of All-Ceramic Reconstruction for Molars. J Can Dent Assoc 2013;79:d140.
17. Fundo P. Endocrown in premolar using lithium di-silicate reinforced ceramic: a case report. Journal of Oral Investigations 2017;6(2):43-49.
18. Hikita K, Meerbeek BV, Munck JD, Ikeda T, Landuyt KV, Maida T et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dental Material 2007;23:71-80.
19. Zidan S, Peeran SW, Ramalingam A. Rely-X unicem self-adhesive universal resin cement. Dentistry and medical research 2015;3(1):3-7.
20. Liu MC. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Premolars and Molars: A Review of Rationales and Techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics and Implantology 2014;3(1):2-16.
21. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130–3.
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.