Comparison Of Uvulo-Glosso-Pharyngeal Dimensions Between Different Vertical Skeletal Facial Patterns

Comparison Of Uvulo-Glosso-Pharyngeal Dimensions Between Different Vertical Skeletal Facial Patterns

Anuradha Rawat, Sanjeev Datana, SS Agarwal, Vishvaroop, SK Bhandari

Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, Armed forces medical college, Pune, India

American Journal of Geographical Research and Reviews

Background: The relationship between pharyngeal airway and dentoskeletal structures have been reported in various studies. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the uvuloglossopharyngeal dimensions in various vertical patterns in skeletal class I subjects. Methodology: The study sample consisted of pre-treatment Lateral cephalogram of 135 subjects (63 males and 72 females, aged 14-21 years) with skeletal class I pattern which were divided into three groups of normodivergent, hypodivergent and hyperdivergent facial patterns with 45 subjects in each group. The inter-group statistical comparison across the three study groups was done using Chi-Square test and the inter-group statistical comparison of medians was done using Kruskal-Wallis H test [non-parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. Results: The distribution of median for upper airway such as SPAS, MAS, IAS, VAL did not differ significantly across three study groups (P-value>0.05 for all). The vertical position of hyoid bone (HH1) was significantly lower in Group 2 compared to Groups 1 and Group 3 (P-value<0.05 for both) and the anteroposterior position of hyoid bone (HRGN) was significantly forward in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (P-value<0.05). Conclusion: No difference in uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions were found in various vertical facial types. Differences were observed in hyoid bone position which was positioned more inferiorly in normodivergent and hyperdivergent subjects when compared to hypodivergent. Anteroposteriorly, hyoid bone was positioned more forward in hypodivergent group than in hyperdivergent.

Keywords: Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions, Pharyngeal airway, Hyoid bone

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:
Anuradha Rawat, Sanjeev Datana, SS Agarwal, Vishvaroop, SK Bhandari. Comparison Of Uvulo-Glosso-Pharyngeal Dimensions Between Different Vertical Skeletal Facial Patterns. International Journal of Dental Research and Reviews, 2019, 2:14


1. Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. Philadelphia: SS White Dental Manufacturing Co.1907.
2. Ricketts RM: Respiratory obstruction syndrome. Am J Orthod.1968;54:495-507.
3. Moore A. Observations on mouthbreathing. J Soc Periodontol.1972;33:9-11.
4. Linder-Aronson S. Adenoids. Their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the dentition- A biometric, rhinomanometric and cephalometric-radiographic study on children with and without adenoids.Acta Otolaryngol Suppl.1970;265:1-132.
5. Tourne LP. Growth of the pharynx and its physiologic implications. Am J Orthod 1961;99:129-39.
6. Johnston CD, Richardson A. Cephalometric changes in adult pharyngeal morphology. Eur J Orthod 1999;21: 357-62.
7. Martin O, Muelas L, Vinas MJ. Nasopharyngeal cephalometric study of ideal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:431-39.
8. Claudino LV, Mattos CT, Ruellas AC, Sant’ Anna EF. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2013;143:799-809.
9. Castro-Silva L, Monnazzi MS, Spin-Neto R, et al. Cone-beam evaluation of pharyngeal airway space in class I, II, and III patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;120:679-83.
10. Ucar FI, Uysal T. Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with Class I malocclusion and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod 2011;81:460-8.
11. Ozbek MM, Miyamoto K, Lowe AA, Fleetham JA. Natural head posture, upper airway anatomy and obstructive sleep apnoea severity in adults. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:133-43.
12. 12. Zhong Z, Tang Z, Gao X, Zeng XL. A comparison study of upper airway among different skeletal craniofacial patterns in nonsnoring Chinese children. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:267–74.
13. Hiyama S, Suda N, Suzuki MI, et al. Effects of maxillary protraction on craniofacial structures and upper airway dimension. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:43–47.
14. Ucar FI, Kurt G, Ekizer A, Ramoglu SI. Effects of functional anterior shifting on skeletal and airway structures. Turkish J Orthod. 2009;22:218–27.
15. Oktay H, Ulukaya E. Maxillary protraction appliance effect on the size of the upper airway passage. Angle Orthod.2008;78:209–14.
16. Abu Allhaija ES1, Al-Khateeb SN. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(6):1012-8.
17. Gungor AY, Turkkahraman H. Effects of airway problems on maxillary growth: a review. Eur J Dent. 2009;3:250–4.
18. Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK. Sagittal mandibular development effects on the dimensions of the awake pharyngeal airway passage. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:1061-7.
19. De Freitas MR, Alcazar NM, Janson G, de Freitas KM, Henriques JF. Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions and different growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(6):742-5.
20. Iqbal N, Rasool G, Alam T, Hussain U, Shah SS. Comparison of different craniofacial patterns with pharyngeal widths. JKCD 2015;6:20‑4.
21. Ucar FI, Uysal T. Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with class I malocclusion and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod 2011;81:460‑8.
22. Malkoc S, Usumez S, Nur M, Donaghy CE. Reproducibility of airway dimensions and tongue and hyoid positions on lateral cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:513‑6.
23. Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher D. Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3‑dimensional reconstruction from cone‑beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:468‑79.
24. Pirila‑Parkkinen K, Lopponen H, Nieminen P, Tolonen U, Paakko E, Pirttiniemi P. Validity of upper airway assessment in children: A clinical, cephalometric, and MRI study. Angle Orthod 2011;81:433‑9.
25. Ceylan I, Oktay H. A study of the pharyngeal size in different skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1995;108:69–75.
26. Saitoh K. Long term changes in pharyngeal airway morphology after mandibular setback surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2004;125:556–61.
27. King EW. A roentgenographic study of pharyngeal growth. Angle Orthod. 1952;22:23–5.
28. Opdebeeck H, Bell WH, Eisenfeld J, Michelevich D. Comparative study between the SFS and LFS rotation as a possible morphogenic mechanism. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:509-21.
29. V Urzal, AC Braga, AP Ferreira. Hyoid Bone Position and Vertical Skeletal Pattern – Open Bite/Deep Bite. OHDM. 2014;13:341-7.
30. Jenaa AK, Duggal R. Hyoid bone position in subjects with different vertical jaw dysplasias. Angle Orthod; 2011:81:81-5.

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details).

This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.