The Tiniest Scientists: What do Infants Know and How Do They Learn About the World?
Biomedicine Academies at Englewood, Englewood NJ, United States
Infants are one of the richest sources of information about the origin of human thinking and learning. Although gathering behavioral and neuroimaging data from infants is incredibly insightful and valuable, infants are a challenging group to study. Unlike adults, they cannot verbally communicate with researchers, make explicit responses, or control their bodies. Given these limitations, developmental scientists have employed smart study paradigms and research technologies to better understand the developmental trajectories of cognition and social understanding in infancy. This review paper provides an overview of the study methods, including looking time measurements and modern neuroimaging techniques and discusses what these approaches taught us about the core knowledge that allows infants to better learn and interact with the world.
Keywords: Infants, Cognitive development, Core knowledge, Developmental psychology
How to cite this article:
Seongkyung Bae. The Tiniest Scientists: What do Infants Know and How Do They Learn About the World?. International Journal of Psychological Research and Reviews, 2020, 3:29. DOI: 10.28933/ijprr-2019-09-2305
1. Aslin, R.N. (2007). What’s in a look? Dev. Sci, 10, 48–53.
2. Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3.5- and 4.5-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 655–664.
3. Baillargeon, R. (1993). The object concept revisited: New directions in the investigation of infants’ physical knowledge. In C. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy: Carnegie Mellon Symposia on Cognition, pp. 265–315.
4. Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E.S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in 5.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191–208.
5. Baxter, L., Fitzgibbon, S., Moultrie, F., Goksan, S., Jenkinson, M., Smith, S., Andersson, J., Duff, E., & Slater, R. (2019). Optimising neonatal fMRI data analysis: Design and validation of an extended dHCP preprocessing pipeline to characterise noxious-evoked brain activity in infants. Neuroimage, 186, 286-300.
6. Biagi, L. et al. (2015). BOLD response selective to flow-motion in very young infants. PLoS Biol, 13, e1002260.
7. Cohen, L.B. (1976). Habituation of infant visual attention. In Habituation: Perspectives From Child Development, Animal Behavior, and Neurophysiology, T. J. Tighe and R. N. Leaton, eds (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum), 207–238.
8. Dale, A.M, Liu, A.K, Fischl, B.R, Buckner, R.L, Belliveau, J.W, Lewine, J.D, & Halgren, E. (2000). Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron, 26, 55-67.
9. Damaraju, E. et al. (2014). Functional connectivity in the developing brain: a longitudinal study from 4 to 9 months of age. Neuroimage, 84, 169–180.
10. Deen, B. et al. (2017). Organization of high-level visual cortex in human infants. Nat. Commun, 8, 13995.
11. Doesburg, S.M. et al. (2013). Region-specific slowing of alpha oscillations is associated with visual-perceptual abilities in children born very preterm. Front. Hum. Neurosci, 7, 791.
12. Doria, V. et al. (2010). Emergence of resting state networks in the preterm human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 107, 20015–20020.
13. Ellis, C.T, & Turk-Browne, N.B. (2018). Infant fMRI: A Model System for Cognitive Neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci, 22, 375-387.
14. Fantz,.R. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science, 146, 668–670.
15. Fransson, P., Skiöld, B., Horsch, S., Nordell, A., Blennow, M., Lagercrantz, H., & Aden, U. (2007). Resting-state networks in the infant brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 15531-15536.
16. Johnson, S.P. (2004). Development of perceptual completion in infancy. Psychol Sci, 15, 769– 775.
17. Kagan, J., & Lewis, M. (1965). Studies of attention in the human infant. Merrill Palmer Q, 11, 95–127.
18. Kouider, S. et al. (2015). Neural dynamics of prediction and surprise in infants. Nat. Commun, 6, 8537.
19. Liu, S., Tomer, D., Tenenbaum, U.J.B., & Spelke, E.S. (2017). Ten-month-old infants infer the value of goals from the costs of actions. Science, 24, 1038-1041.
20. Merchant, N et al. (2009). A patient care system for early 3. 0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of very low birth weight infants. Early Hum. Dev, 85, 779–783.
21. Mitra, A., Snyder ,A.Z, Tagliazucchi, E, et al. (2017). Resting-state fMRI in sleeping infants more closely resembles adult sleep than adult wakefulness. PLoS One, 12, e0188122.
22. Moore, M.K, & Meltzoff, A.N. (1999). New findings on object permanence: A developmental difference between two types of occlusion. Br J Dev Psychol, 17, 623–644.
23. Olson, G.M. (1976). An information-processing analysis of visual memory and habituation in infants. In Habituation. Perspectives From Child Development, Animal Behavior, and Neurophysiology, T. J. Tighe and R. N. Leaton, eds (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum), pp. 239–278.
24. Spelke, E.S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29–56.
25. Spelke, E.S, Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605–632.
26. Spelke, E.S., & Kinzler, D.K. (2007). Core Knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89-96.
27. Stahl, A.E, & Feigenson, L. (2015). Observing the unexpected enhances infants’ learning and exploration. Science, 348, 91–94.
28. Stahl, A.E, & Feigenson, L. (2017). Expectancy violations promote learning in young children. Cognition, 163, 1-14.
29. Weisberg, D.S, & Sobel, D.M. (2012). Young children discriminate improbable from impossible events in fiction. Cognitive Development, 27, 90–98.
30. Xie, W., & Richards, J.E. (2016). Effects of interstimulus intervals on behavioral, heart rate, and event-related potential indices of infant engagement and sustained attention. Psychophysiology, 53, 1128–1142
31. Xu, F., & Spelke, E.S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1-B11.
32. Zhong, H., Shen, D., & Lin, W. (2019). Resting-state functional MRI studies on infant brains: A decade of gap-filling efforts. Neuroimage, 185, 664-684.