Brenna Santos Batista¹*, Caroline Santana Santos², João Adriano Correia Santos³, Rodolfo Silva Oliveira4, Bianca Silva Oliveira5


Objectives: To review in the literature the perception of ICU health professionals, as members of an interdisciplinary team.

Methods: This is an integrative literature review, carried out between July and August 2020. The data collection took place between the years 2012 to 2020, in the electronic databases PubMed (National Library of Medicine and National Institute of Health – USA) and Scielo (Scientific Electronic Library Online), through the DeCS (health descriptors) “patient care team”, “intensive care units” and “health”, in English and Portuguese.

Results: After applying the eligibility criteria for this review, 7 articles were selected, read in full. The results showed the existence of division and fragmentation of work; lack of communication between team members and users; hierarchy of power and ethical conflict within the multiprofessional team; and inadequate working conditions.

Conclusion: This research made it possible to recognize the weaknesses experienced by the multiprofessional ICU team and to understand the main factors that hinder the team’s work.

Keywords: Intensive care unit. Patient care team. Cheers.

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:
Brenna Santos Batista, Caroline Santana Santos, João Adriano Correia Santos, Rodolfo Silva Oliveira, Bianca Silva Oliveira.INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ASSISTING PATIENTS IN AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: A LITERATURE REVIEW.Research Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2021, 4:13.


1. Bolela F. Humanization in intensive care from the perspective of the health team [master’s thesis]. Ribeirão Preto: Nursing School of Ribeirão Preto – USP; 2008.
2. BRAZIL. Ministry of Health. National Policy for Critical Patient Care. Ordinance no. 1,071, of July 4, 2005.
3. Matos E, Pires DEP, Campos GWS. Work relations in interdisciplinary teams: contributions to the construction of new forms of work organization in health. Brazilian Journal of Nursing. 2009; 62 [6]: 863-869.
4. Littike D, Sodré F. The art of improvisation: the work process of the managers of a Federal University Hospital. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2015; 20 [10]: 3051-62.
5. Silva SEM, Moreira MCN. Health team: negotiations and limits of autonomy, belonging and recognition of the other. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2015; 20 [10]: 3033-42.
6. Neto JDA, Silva ISP, Zanin LE, Andrade AP, Moraes KM. HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AT THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: PERCEPTION OF RESTRICTIVE FACTORS OF MULTIPROFISSIONAL PERFORMANCE. Brazilian Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 29, no. 1, enero-marzo, 2016, pp. 43-50.
7. Goulart BF, Camel SHH, Simões ALA, Chaves LDP. Teamwork in a Coronary Unit: facilitating and hindering aspects. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2016; 5 [3]: 479-86. doi:
8. Morgan S, Pullon S, McKinlay E. Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: an integrative literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52 [7]: 1217-30.
9. Brazil, Ministry of Health. National Secretariat for Health Care. National Humanization Program for Hospital Care. Brasília: National Health Assistance Secretariat, 60p. 2001.
10. Meira SS, Matos SB, Viela ABA. Humanized practices in intensive care: considerations of the multidisciplinary health team. Memorias International Convention on Public Health. Cuba Salud, 2012.
11. Evangelista VC, Domingos TS, Siqueira FPC, Braga EM. Multiprofessional intensive care team: humanization and fragmentation of the work process. Rev. Bras. Nurse vol.69 no.6 Brasília nov./dez. 2016. Doi:
12. Mazutti SRG, Nascimento AF, Fumis RRL. Limitation of Advanced Life Support in patients admitted to an intensive care unit with integrated palliative care. Rev. bras. Tue. intensive vol.28 no.3 São Paulo July / Sept. 2016 Epub Sep 09, 2016. doi:
13. Bishop BHR, Aleluia IMB. The multidisciplinary team’s perception of interdisciplinary care in an Intensive Care Unit in Salvador, Bahia. Network Health. 2019; 5 [1]: 115-125. doi: hp: //
14. Araujo Neto JD, Silva ISP, Zanin LE, Andrade AP, Moraes KM. Health professionals in the intensive care unit: perception of the restrictive factors of multiprofessional practice. Brazilian Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 29, no. 1, enero-marzo, 2016, pp. 43-50.
15. Goldwasser RS, Lobo MSC, Arruda EF, Angelo SA, Ribeiro ECO, Silva JRL. Planning and understanding of the intensive care network in the State of Rio de Janeiro: a complex social problem. Rev. bras. Tue. intensive vol.30 no.3 São Paulo July / Sept. 2018. doi:
16. Noce LGA, Oliveira TS, Melo LC, Silva KFB, Parreira BDM, Goulart BF. Interprofessional relationships of an intensive care patient care team. Rev. Bras. Nurse vol.73 no.4 Brasília 2020 Epub June 24, 2020. doi:
17. Galvão TF, Pansani TSA, Harrad D. Main items to report Systematic reviews and meta-analyzes: The PRISMA recommendation. Epidemiology and Health Services, v. 24, p. 335-342, 2015. doi: 10.5123 / S1679-49742015000200017.
18. Maia JC, Coutinho JFV, Sousa CRD, Barbosa RGB, Mota FRDN, Marques MB et al. Assistive technologies for elderly people with dementia: systematic review. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, vol. 31, n. 6, p. 651-658, 2018. doi: 10.1590 / 1982-0194201800089.

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details).

This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.