Response of Growth and Yield of Potato to Neb-26 as a Source of Nitrogen

Response of Growth and Yield of Potato to Neb-26 as a Source of Nitrogen

Mst. Tazmin Akhter1, Md. Rafiqul Islam1*, M. Rafiqul Islam1, Muhammad Tahir Shehzad2 and Abu Bakkar Siddique2

1Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
2Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia.

American Journal of Agricultural Research

This Urea is a vital source of nitrogen (N) to be supplied for plants but most of it is lost through processes including volatilization, denitrification, leaching and run-off. So, it is timely to find out an alternative source of nitrogen fertilizer. A field experiment was, therefore, carried out at Soil Science Field Laboratory of Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during 2016-2017 with a view to investigating the effectiveness of NEB-26 (a liquid N fertilizer introduced by Advanced Chemical Industries (ACI) Limited) in combination with urea on the growth and yield of potato. The soil was silt loam in texture having a pH 6.4, organic matter 1.55%, total N 0.091%, available P 3.30 mg kg-1, available K 0.08 me 100-1 g soil, available S 6.46 mg kg-1 and available Zn 0.86 mg kg-1. The experiment consisted of five treatments laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications. The treatments were T1: Control (no N fertilizer), T2: 100% N from urea, T3: 50% N from urea, T4: 50% N from urea + 500 ml ha-1 NEB-26 and T5: 50% N from urea + 750 ml ha-1 NEB-26. The potato variety used in the experiment was ‘Diamant’. The recommended doses of N (140 kg ha-1), P (25 kg ha-1), K (135 kg ha-1) and S (15 kg ha-1) were supplied from urea, TSP, MoP and gypsum, respectively. All the fertilizers except urea were applied as basal dose. Urea was applied in three installments and the NEB-26 was applied as per treatment at the time of second installment of urea application. The crop was harvested at maturity and the yield components and yields were recorded. The results indicate that the yield attributes, tuber yield and haulm yield of potato were significantly influenced by N supplied from urea and NEB-26. The tuber yield varied from 10.83 t ha-1 in T1 (Control) to 23.20 t ha-1 in T2 (100% N from urea). The maximum tuber yield (23.20 t ha-1) was recorded in T2 (100% N from urea) which was statistically similar to T4: 50% N from urea + 500 ml ha-1 NEB-26. Based on tuber yield, the treatments can be ranked in the order of T2 >T4 > T3 >T5 >T1. The N content and uptake by both potato tuber and haulm were also influenced significantly by N supplied from urea and NEB-26. From the overall results, it can be concluded that the NEB-26 can be used in combination with urea for potato production and the use of NEB-26 can reduce about 30% N without reducing potato tuber yield.

Keywords:NEB-26, Nitrogen, Urea, Potato, Yield

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:

Sana Abusin. Natural resource modelling: accounting for gillnet size selectivity in dynamic deterrence model. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 2018,3:22. DOI:10.28933/ajar-2018-7-2301


1. Antons R and Ilze S, 2013. Influence of nitrogen on potato productivity and nutrient use efficiency. Proc. Latvian Acad. Sci. 67(3): 247–253.
2. BARC, 2012. Fertilizer Recommendation Guide, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC), Farmgate, Dhaka.
3. BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics), 2017. Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh. Statistical Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
4. Black CA, 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis part-1 and part-II. Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. Madison, Wiscosin, USA. p. 770.
5. Bremner JM and Mulvaney CS, 1982. Nitrogen-Total. In methods of soil Analysis Part 2. Edited by A.L. Page, R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney. pp. 595-624. Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. and Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Inc., Madison, Wisconsin
6. Chapman HD, 1965. Cation exchange capacity. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 edited by C.A. Black. Amer. Soc. Agron., Inc. Publisher, USA. pp. 891-901.
7. Fontes PCR, Braun H, Camilo B and Paulo RC, 2010. Economic optimum nitrogen fertilization rates and nitrogen fertilization rate effects on tuber characteristics of potato cultivars. Potato Res. 53: 167–179.
8. Gomez KA, Gomez AK, 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wilely and Sons New York 207-215.
9. Haase T, Schuler C and Heb J, 2007. The effect of different N and K sources on tuber nutrient uptake, total and graded yield of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) for processing. European J. Agron. 26: 187-197.
10. Hashemidezfooli A, Koochakiand A and Banayanavval M, 1998. Crop plant improvement (translation). Jehad Daneshgahi Mashhad press pp 350.
11. Knudsen D, Peterson GA and Pratt PF, 1982. Lithium, Sodium and Potassium. In methods of Soil Analysis Prt 2 edited by Page, Miller and Keenly. Amer. Soc. Agron., Inc. Publisher, USA. pp. 225-245.
12. Kołodziejczyk M, 2014: Effect of nitrogen fertilization and microbial preparations on potato yielding. Plant Soil Environ. 8: 379–386.
13. Michael Peech, 1965. Hydrogen-ion activity. In methods of soil analysis part 2 edited by C. A. Black. Amer. Soc. Agron., Inc. Publisher, USA pp. 914-926.
14. Moreno A, Moreno MM, Ribas F and Cabello MJ, 2003. Influence of nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under irrigated conditions. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 1(1): 91–100.
15. Olsen SR, Cole CU, Watanable FS and Deun LA, 1954. Estiamtion of available P in soil extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Agril. Cir. Pp: 929.
16. Soliman, El-Kabbany EA and Khatab KA, 2000. Effect of sources and rates of nitrogen fertilization on growth, yield and tuber quality of potatoes. Egypt. Annals Agric. Sci. 3(Special): 1111-1126.
17. Sriom DP, Mishra, Priyanka R, Prateek K and Gaurav S, 2017. Effect of nitrogen levels on yield and yield attributes of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cv. Kufri Khayti. Int. J. Current Microbiol. Applied Sci. 6 (8): 3572-3576.
18. The Amader Orthoniti, 2017. 50% Savage of urea can be possible on potato production. The 11th August 2017.
19. Vaezzadeh, 2012. The effect of various nitrogen fertilizer amounts on yield and nitrate accumulation in tubers of two potato cultivars in cold regions of Isfahan, Iran. Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 4(22): 1688-1691.
20. Walkley and Black CV, 1934. An examination of the Degtjereff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification for the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37: 29-38.
21. Williams CH and Stenbergs A, 1959. Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils: Aust. J. Agric. Res. 10: 340-352.
22. Zisheng X, Bernie J and Zebarth, 2016. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on potato yields and soil nitrate leaching. Proc. Int. Nitrogen Initiative Conf. held during 4 – 8 December 2016 in Melbourne, Australia.

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details).

This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.