Comparison of Customary and Formal Tenure Systems in Benishangul Gumuz Regional State: A case of Assosa District

Comparison of Customary and Formal Tenure Systems in Benishangul Gumuz Regional State: A case of Assosa District

Cheneke Atomsa Merga

Bahirdar University Institute of land

Though the global trend is to manage land through formal systems, still there is debate among scholars on importance of customary tenure systems and its treatment in modern land formalization. The study done in the study area also indicates the contradicting debate on both tenure systems, whether customary land tenure activities should recognized as it is or selectively in modern land formalization. However, their argument was not after studying and comparing both tenure systems simultaneously, making major problem needed to be identified in this study. Therefore, the study in this thesis aimed to assess and compare customary and formal tenure systems. Both descriptive and explanatory case study type of research was used in this study. Similarly, both qualitative and quantities data were collected from primary and secondary data sources. The primary data were collected by using different data collection tools like interview question, In-depth-key informant interview, focal group discussion and field observation. The survey data obtained from 360 house hold heads were analyzed by using SPSS (IBM-21) in which descriptive cross-tabulation model was mainly used. To compare means of continues variables, one –way ANOVA and descriptive system were also used. The study findings from House hold survey indicate significant variation between formal and customary tenure systems at (P< 0.05) and (P <0.01) based on socio-economic factors (except variation in sex and marital status (p > 0.05);land related explanatory variables like land accessibility, defining right, ensuring tenure security, legalization of land transfer and conflict reduction and resolution; and Local farmers ‘perception on importance of modern land formalization -that was positive in formalized tenure and negative in customary tenure. These findings were triangulated with data collected with other tools. Based on the findings, the researcher recommends recognition of non formal customary tenure selectively in modern land formalization policies, rules, regulations and laws. For place where formalization coverage takes longer time to achieve, customary systems should have legally accepted bylaws and effective institution.

Keywords: Land accessibility, land titling, Land transfer, Land related disputes, and Local farmers’ perception

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:

Cheneke Atomsa Merga.Comparison of Customary and Formal Tenure Systems in Benishangul Gumuz Regional State: A case of Assosa District. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 2020,5:92.


1. Ashenafi G. N.,(2013): Local Governance in Rural Land Conflict Management: The case of Ganta Afeshum wereda, Eastern Zone of Tigray, A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Management, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Development Studies (Governance, Democracy and Development Specialization)
2. Augustinus, C.(2003): Comparative Analysis of Land Administration Systems: African Review With Special Reference To Mozambique, Uganda, Namibia, Ghana, South Africa, Work Undertaken For The World Bank, Funded By Dfid, Pp 9-10
3. Bamlak Y.(2013): Assessment Of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Systems snd Practices: Implications For Socio-Economic Development: (A Survey Of Simada Woreda, Amhara Region, Ethiopia) ;Thesis Submitted To The Department Of Managment In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirement For The Award Of Master Of Arts Degree In Development Studies (Governance, Democracy And Development), Mekelle
4. Bassett, T. J. (1993). Introduction: The Land Question and Agricultural Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. In T.J. Bassett & D.E. Crummey (Eds.), Land in African Agrarian Systems. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Benishangul Gumz Region, 2010. Lisane Hig Gazeta Proclamation on Rural Land Administration and Use, Proclamation No. 85 /2010, Assosa
6. Benishangul Gumz Region, 2011. Lisane Hig Gazeta Regulation on the implementation of Rural Land Administration and Use Proclamation, Proclamation No. 44 /2011, Assosa
7. Benishangul Gumz Region, 2014. Lisane Hig Gazeta Directive on the implementation of Rural Land Administration and Use Proclamation and Regulation, Proclamation No.18 /2014, Assosa
8. Berhanu, G. and Pender and Girmay, T. 2003. Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia. International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, D.C. 2003 U.S.A. EPTD Discussion Paper,No. 60
9. Black, H.C.(1991); Black’s law Dictionary with Pronunciations, 6th Edition,
10. Bruce, J. W.; Hoben, A.; &Rahmato, D. (1994).After the Derg: An assessment of rural land tenure issues in Ethiopia. Madison, Wisconsin: Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
11. Cohen, John and Weintraub, Dov, 1975, Land and Peasants in Imperial Ethiopia: The Social Background of a Revolution. Van Gorkum, Assen in Africa
12. Collis, J &Hussey,R ( 2009): Business Research a Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Post Graduate Students, 3rd Edition, Pulgrave Macmillan, UK, Pp 143-155, 191-2002.
13. Conteh, S. Yeshanew, S.A.(2016): Non‐judicial Grievance mechanisms in land‐related disputes in Sierra Leone, FAO, SBN 978‐92‐5‐109328‐3, ISSN 2413‐807X,
14. Cotula L. (2007): CHANGES IN “CUSTOMARY” LAND TENURE SYSTEMS IN AFRICA ISBN: 978-1-84369-657-5es in “customary
15. Davies, S (2008): The Political Economy of Land Tenure in Ethiopia, A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University Of St. Andrews. Pp.35-47
16. Deininger, K., Ali, D. A., Holden, S. &Zevenbergen, J. (2008).’Rural Land Certification in Ethiopia: Process, Initial Impact, and Implications for Other African Countries’. World Development, Vol. 36No.10., pp. 1786-1812.
17. Deinniger, K., Daniel A. Ali &Alemu ,T.,( 2008).Impacts of Land Certification on Tenure Security, Investment,and Land Market. Evidence from Ethiopia. The World Bank, Washington D.C
18. Denscombe, M. (2007)The Good Research Guide For Small- Scale Social research Projects, 3rdEd.McGraw Hill, Open Space University Press PP-270.
19. Denzin, N.K (1978) The research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods,2nd edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Dereje T., Hossein A., Jan N., Mitiku H., and Frank W. (2016) How Sustainable Is Transnational Farmland Acquisition In Ethiopia? Lessons Learned From Benishangul –Gumuz Regional State’
21. Desalegn Ch.Ed.,Mukand S.B.,Ashim D.G.and Seleshi B.A.(2015): Indigenous systems of conflict resolution in Oromia, Ethiopia, International workshop on ‘African Water Laws: Plural Legislative Frameworks for Rural Water Management in Africa.’, Johannesburg, South Africa
22. Fao,(2002).Fao land Tenure Studies (4), Gender and Access to Land, ISBN 92-5-104847-9
23. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 1995. Negarit Gazeta Proclamation of the Constitution of the Proclamation No. 1/1995, Addis Ababa.2005. Negarit Gazeta Proclamation of Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Rural Land Administration and Land Use, Proclamation No. 456/2005, Addis Ababa.
24. Gofie S.M. (2015): Central Control and Regional States’ Autonomy in Ethiopia. In: LeVan A.C., Fashagba J.O., McMahon E.R. (eds) African State Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London Chaper 7; pp 158-76.
25. Gyapong, P, (2009): Applying Customary tenure Institution for Land Administration: Good governance perspective, Msc thesis submitted to, International Institute for Geo-information science and earth observation , The Nezerlands.
26. Habtamu S.,(2016).The Effect Of Formalization Of Land Tenure On Customary Land Transfer In Benishangul Gumuz Region: The Case Of Belojiganfoy Woreda , Bahirdar University, Institute of land administration.PP 12-23
27. Holden, S., Otsuka, K. and Deininger, K. (Eds.) (2013). Land Tenure Reforms in Asia and Africa: Impacts on Poverty and Natural Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Hussein J., 2004: THE POLITICS OF LAND TENURE IN ETHIOPIAN: Experience from the south. Paper for XI world Congress of Rural Sociology, Trondheim, Norwey. PP, 9-12.
29. Jamarillo, C.F. Kelly, T. 1998. Property rights and deforestation in Latin America. In: Kari, K. (ed.). Forest resource policy in Latin America. Johns Hopkins university press.
30. Jick,T.D(1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action ,Administrative science Quarterly, December,24, pp. 602-11. Oaks, New Delhi. Pp 126-142.
31. Kelemework T.R.(2014): Formal and informal land tenure systems in Afar region, Ethiopia Perceptions, attitudes and implications for land use disputes
32. Kumar,R.(2005): Research Methedology, Second Edition, Sage Publication, London, Thousand
33. Lasserve A.D,Fernandes, E.,Payne G., and Rakodi, C. (2007):Socia; and economic impacts of land titling programmes in urban and peri-urban areas:A review of the literature, Government of Nprmay Ministry of Foreign Affairs, PP 58-59
34. Leedy, P.D. &Ormrod, J.E (2001): Practical Research Planning and Design, Seventhe Edition, Merril Prentice Hall,Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Columbs,Ohio,Pp 159-162, 197-2002.
35. Lemma, S. F.(2015). The Challenges of Land Law Reform, Smallholder Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in Ethiopia. Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) at the School of Law of the University of Warwick, PP 196-2111.
36. Lemmen,C 2012. A domain model for land administration.Delfl, Nederland.
37. Muradu A.S., (2014).State Policy And Law In Relation To Land Alienation In Ethiopia, A Thesis Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements of The Degree of Doctor of
38. Negasa D. S.(2016). The Role of Land Certification in Securing Women’s Land Rights in Beneshangul Gumuz Region, Ethiopia: Does Legal Pluralism Serve their benefits: Paper Prepared for Presentation at The “2016 World Bank Conference On Land and Poverty” The World Bank – Washington Dc, March 14-18. Philosophy In Law University of Warwick, School of Law.Pp 58-60.
39. Negasa D. S.,(2017).The Role of Rural Land Registration in Enhancing Governance and Tenure Security of Communal Holding in Beneshangul Gumuz Regional State of Ethiopia: Paper Prepared For Presentation at The “2017 World Bank Conference On Land and Poverty” The World Bank – Washington Dc, Pp 13-16
40. Peters, P.E.,(2007): Challenges in Land Tenure and Land Reform in Africa: An Anthropological Perspective. CID(Center for International development) at Harvard University, Working Paper No. 141
41. Qualtrics,X.M,2019: Survey Analysis and Reporting; Cross-Tabulation analysis; research Guide
42. Sayeh A.(2014): Detecting Urban Expansion and Land Tenure Security assessment: The case of Bahir Dar and DebreMarkosPeri-Urban Areas of Ethiopia, Paper prepared for presentation at the 2014 world Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, World Bank Washington DC, Pp.1-3.
43. Seid S. and Adugna L. 2016. Rural house holds’ Livelihood Strategies; options and determinants in the case of Assosa District, Benishangul Gumuz Regional state, western Ethiopia, Assosa university proceeding of second annual research conference. Pp 302-305
44. Semeneh B.D.2015. Collective Action, Property Rights and Bamboo Deforestation in Benishangul-Gumuz Region, Ethiopia. PhD thesis, Haramaya University. PP 39-42.
45. Sharma, A.K.,2005: Dph Mathematics Serries Text Book of Correlation And Regression, DPH, Discovery And Publishing House New Delhi-110002
46. Stickler , M.D.Huntington,H.,And Ewing B, (2018): Measuring Community Perceptions Of Tenure Security: Evidence From Four African Countries Paper Prepared For Presentation At The “2018 World Bank Conference On Land And Poverty” The World Bank – Washington Dc.
47. Swynnerton, R.J.M., 1954, A Plan to Intensify the Development of African Agriculture in Kenya, Nairobi, Government Printer.
48. UNECE, 2005. Land administration in the UNECE region. Development trends and main principle united nation, newyork, Geneva.
49. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), 2004:- How to Develop a Pro-Poor land Policy: Process, Guide and Lessons .Secure Land Rights for All, Global Land tool Network, HS/978/08E/ ISBN-978-92-1-131961-3
50. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), 2007:- How to Develop a Pro Poor land Policy: Process, Guide and Lessons .Secure Land Rights for All, Global Land tool Network, Pp 2-3.
51. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), 2008:- How to Develop a Pro-Poor land Policy: Process, Guide and Lessons .Secure Land Rights for All, Global Land tool Network,GPO Nairobi 00100,kenya, Pp 8-9.
52. USAID (2014a): Land Administration to Nurture Development (LAND) Impact Evaluation Design Report. Washington, DC.
53. Watson., (2010): Gender Issues and Pastoral Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia. In Land Administration to Nurture Development, Gender issues in Ethiopian PastoralCommunities, USAID/ETHIOPIA.Pp.81-85.
54. Williamson, I, Enemark, S, Wallace, J, Rakabifard, A (2010), Land Administration for Sustainable Development, ESRI Press Academy, Redlands, CA, California.pp:5-15
55. Wilson, R.J.A., 1971, “Land Tenure and Economic Development – A Study of the Economic Consequences of Land Registration in Kenya’s Smallholder Areas”, Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, Vol. XXII, Part. III, pp. 124-151.
56. Yemane T., (1967): Introductory Analysis,2nd edition, new York university statistics, A harper international edition jointly published by Harper and Row, New York, Evanston and Londonand John weatherhill, Imk,. Tokyo
57. YigremewAdal (2002).Review of Landholding Systems and Policies in Ethiopia under the Different Regimes.Pp 4-7
58. Zelelem T.A. and Williams N.L.2005: Indigenous Common Property Resource Management in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia, Human Ecology, Vol. 33; DOI: 10.1007/s10745-005-5159-9