Perception of college students regarding the use of ICT: A case study in Monterrey, México


Perception of college students regarding the use of ICT: A case study in Monterrey, México


Araiza Vázquez, Maria de Jesús1 and Pedraza Sánchez, Erika Yadira2

1Doctor in Instructional Technology and Distance Education Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, México;
2Doctor in Social Sciences with orientation in Sustainable Development Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, México


American journal of educational research and reviews

We often take for granted that students have the basic skills and mastery of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), however, it has been confirmed that not all students are equally competent in this regard. From the theories of socialization and acceptance of the technology, a structural equation model (SEM) is built to explore the variance in basic ICT skills levels of students at a business school. With the application of a questionnaire that measured in detail ICT skills of new students in a higher education institution in Mexico, the main findings show that according to the tables of impact value between constructs and the significance between constructs, the skills have a significant and significant negative impact on the side of anxiety / behavior and on the side of the utility there is a strong, significant impact.


Keywords: higher education, students, digital skills, self-perception.


Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Araiza Vázquez, Maria de Jesús and Pedraza Sánchez, Erika Yadira.Perception of college students regarding the use of ICT: A case study in Monterrey, México. American Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 2019,4:55. DOI: 10.28933/ajerr-2019-05-0606


References:
1. Area, M., Gutiérrez, A., Vidal, F. (2012). Alfabetización digital y competencias informacionales. Revista Didáctica, Innovación y Multimedia, (23), 225-231.
2. Aslanidou, S., & Menexes, G. (2008). Youth and the Internet: Uses and practices in the home. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1375-1391.
3. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
4. Bolstad, R. (2011). Taking a “Future Focus” in Education-What Does It Mean?. Recuperado de: http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/taking-future-focus-in-education.pdf.
5. Carrasco, M., Sánchez, C., y Carro, A. (2015). Las competencias digitales en estudiantes del posgrado en educación. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, vol. 12 (12), 10-18. Recuperado de: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/695/69542291002.pdf
6. Caverly, D. C, Nicholson, S. A., y Radcliffe, R. (2004). The effectiveness of strategic reading instruction for college developmental readers. The Journal of College Reading & Learning. Vol 35 (1), 25 – 49. Recuperado de http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ690841.pdf
7. CEPAL (2013) Economía digital para el cambio estructural y la igualdad. Recuperado de: http//www.cepal.org/Socinfo.
8. Chen, Dereck y Dahlman, Carl. (2005). The Knowledge Economy, the KAM Methodology and World Bank Operations. 1(1), 1-15. Recuperado de: http://siteresources.worldbank. org/KFDLP/Resources/KAM_Paper_WP.pdf
9. Chen, S., Chang, W. H., Lai, C. H., & Tsai, C. Y. (2014). A comparison of students’ approaches to inquiry, conceptual learning, and attitudes in simulation-based and microcomputer-based laboratories. Science Education, 98(5), 905-935.
10. Chin, W. W. & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical strategies for small sample research, 1(1), 307-341.
11. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
12. Chowdhury, S., Gibb, F., & Landoni, M. (2011). Uncertainty in information seeking and retrieval: A study in an academic environment. Information Processing and Management, 47(2), 157-175.
13. Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, 0. E. (1995). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 281-302.
14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
15. De Wit, K., Heerwegh, D., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2012). Changes in the basic ICT skills of freshmen between 2005 and 2009: Who’s catching up and who’s still behind? Education and Information Technologies, 17(2), 205-231.
16. Donnelly, D., O’Reilly, J., & McGarr, O. (2013). Enhancing the student experiment experience: Visible scientific inquiry through a virtual chemistry laboratory. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1571- 1592.
17. ECDL. Foundation. (2014). La falacia del “nativo digital”: ¿Por qué los jóvenes necesitan desarrollar sus habilidades digitales? Recuperado de https://www.uv.mx/blogs/sea/2016/04/26/la-falacia-del-nativo-digital-por-que-los-jovenes-necesitan-desarrollar-sus-habilidades-digitales/
18. ECDL. Foundation. (2010). ECDL syllabus 5.0. Utrecht: ECDL Nederland NV. Edgar, L. D., Johnson, D. M., & Cox, C. (2012). A 10- year assessment of information and communication technology tasks required in undergraduate agriculture courses. Computers & Education, 59, 741-749.
19. España, C y Corrales, X (2014). Un estudio exploratorio sobre el desarrollo de competencias digitales en la educación superior. Revista ABRA, Vol. 34 (49), 1-25. Recuperado de http: http://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/abra/article/view/6176
20. Graham, D. L. (2001). Employer perception of the preparation of agricultural and extension education graduates. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 51(1), 88- 101.
21. Heerwegh, D., De Wit, K., y Verhoeven, JC. (2016). Exploring the self-reported ICT skill levels of under- Exploring the self-reported ICT Skill Levels of Undergraduate Science Students. Journal of Information Technology Education. Vol.15, 19-47. Recuperado de: http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol15/JITEv15ResearchP019-047Heerwegh1946.pdf
22. Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2015). Digital competence an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Infor- mation Technologies (in press). Retrieved from http:// link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
23. Kaminski, K., Switzer, J., & Gloeckner, G. (2009). Workforce readiness: a study of university students’ fluency with infor- mation technology. Computers & Education, 53(2), 228- 233.
24. Kubiatko, M., & Vlckova, K. (2010). The relationship between ICT use and science knowledge for Czech students: a secondary analysis of PISA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 523-543.
25. Mac Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2013). The influence of students’ ICT skills and their adoption of mobile learning. Austra- lasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 303- 3014.
26. Mac Callum, K., Jeffrey, L., & Kinshuk. (2014). Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 39(October), 8-19.
27. Mainero, R. (2006). Desarrollo de habilidades para la resolución de problemas en estudiantes de ingenierías: estudio de la relación entre rendimiento académico y estrés. Técnicas para su manejo. Tesis inédita. Universidad Iberoamericana, México.
28. Mead, G. H. (1972). The philosophy of the act. (Seventh Impression ed., Vol. 3). (C. W. Morris, Ed.) Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
29. Miliszewska, I. (2008). ICT skills: An essential graduate skill in today’s global economy. Proceedings of the Informing Science & IT Education Conference (In SITE), 101-109. Recuperado de http://proceedings.informings cience.org/InSITE2008.
30. Monereo, C. (2009). Competencia digital: para qué, quién, dónde y cómo debe enseñarse. Revista Aula de Innovación Educativa, Vol(181), 1-18. Recuperado de https://www.resear chgate.net/publication/257944704_Competencia_digital_para_que_quien_donde_y_como_debe_ensenarse.
31. National Research Council. (1999). Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/6482.
32. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory, 1st ed., New York: McGraw-Hill
33. OCDE (2005). La Definición y la Selección de Competencias Clave. Recuperado de: http://deseco.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/03/02.parsys.78532.downloadList.94248.DownloadFile.tmp/2005.dscexecutivesummary.sp.pdf
34. OCDE (2010). Habilidades y competencias del siglo XXI para los aprendices del milenio en los países de la OCDE. Instituto de Tecnologías Educativas. Paper no. 41. Recuperado de: http://recursostic.educacion.es/blogs/europa/media/blogs/europa/informes/Habilidades_y_competencias_siglo21_OCDE.pdf
35. Okyere-Kwakye, E, Md-Nor, K y Ologbo, A. (2016). Technology Acceptance: Examining the Intentions of Ghanaian Teachers to Use Computer for teaching. Arch. & Inf. Sc. Vol. 26 (2), 117-130. Recuperado de: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=fb052f64-fdef-4285-bcb5-3991b7fb96b6%40pdc-v-sessmgr01
36. 36. Parsons, T. (1964). The social system. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
37. Rositas, J. (2005). Los tamaños de las muestras en encuestas de las ciencias sociales y su repercusión en la generación del conocimiento, Innovaciones de Negocios, 11(22), 235-268.
38. Ridgewell, J., & Exley, B. (2011). The potentials of student initiated netspeak in a middle primary scienceinspired multiliteracies project. Research in Science Education, 41(5), 635- 649.
39. Shibutani, T. (1986). Social Processes. An Introduction to Sociolo- gy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40. Simmel, G. (1910). How is society possible? American Journal of Sociology, 16(3), 372-391. Retrieved from http://www. jstor.org/stable/276309
41. Sotelo, M; Ramos, D y Tánori, A. (2009). Habilidades y actitudes en estudiantes que cursan materias en modalidad virtual-presencial en una institución de educación superior. Recuperado de: http://www.comie.org.mx/congreso/memoriaelectronica/v10/pdf/area_tematica_01/ponencias/0978-F.pdf
42. Summers, T. A., & Vlosky, R. P. (2001). Technology in the class- room: the LSU College of Agriculture Faculty perspective. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 18(2), 79-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650740110386152
43. UNESCO. (2005). Hacia las Sociedades del Conocimiento. Recuperado de: http://unesdoc.unesco. org/images/0014/001419/141908s.pdf
44. UNESCO. (2009). Conferencia Mundial sobre Educación Superior-2009: La nueva dinámica de la educación superior y la investigación para el cambio social y el desarrollo, Paris, UNESCO, 5-8 de julio de 2009. Recuperado de: http://www.unesco.org/education/WCHE2009/comunicado_es.pdf
45. Van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population. In- formation, Communication & Society, 18(7), 782-797.
46. Verhoeven, J. C., Heerwegh, D., & De Wit, K. (2010). Information and communication technologies in the life of university freshmen: An analysis of change. Computers & Education, 55(1), 53-66.