Here We Go Again: An Analysis of Re-Segregation in Georgia Charter Schools


Here We Go Again: An Analysis of Re-Segregation in Georgia Charter Schools

Andrea N. Smith, Ed.D.

University of West Georgia, College of Education, Early Childhood Through Secondary Education


American journal of educational research and reviews

Scholars note that failing public schools are the civil rights issue of our day (Frankenberg, 2011; Orfield, 2004). The current discussion about school reform in the U.S. over the past two decades has shifted from one of equity to one based on excellence in the form of student achievement. A primary solution for student achievement has been popularized and made into dominant discourse through legislation such as No Child Left Behind (2001) and Race to the Top (2009). In this analysis, the author provides a historical context of the charter school movement as a backdrop for charter school enrollment trends and policy in Georgia. As charter schools in Georgia continue to gain popularity as a primary school choice option for African American students, it is essential that policymakers create charter legislation that encourages the creation of socioeconomically and racially diverse schools. Moreover, both policymakers and stakeholders in education need to decide to what end are we expanding choice, and what kinds of choice might get us closer to more integrated, and ultimately, democratic schools?


Keywords: Re-Segregation, Georgia Charter Schools


Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Andrea N. Smith. Here We Go Again: An Analysis of Re-Segregation in Georgia Charter Schools. American Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 2019,4:60. DOI: 10.28933/ajerr-2019-07-1605


References:
1. Armor, D. J. (1983). The Evidence on Desegregation and Black Achievement.
2. Bifulco, R. & Ladd, H.F. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina’s charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 31-56.
3. Brown-Jeffy, S. (2006). The race gap in high school reading achievement: Why school racial composition still matters. Race, Gender & Class, 268-294.
4. Center for Urban and Multicultural Education. (2010). Charter Schools Research Brief. Indiana University School of Education, Indianapolis, IN. Retrieved from http://education.iupui.edu/cume/pdf/charterschoolsbrieffinal.pdf
5. Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vigdor, J.L. (2013). Racial and economic diversity in North Carolina’s schools: An update. Durham, NC: Duke Sanford School of Public Policy.
6. Cobb, C.D. & Glass, G.V. (2003). Arizona charter schools: Resegregating public education? Chicago, IL: American Educational Research Association
7. Center for Research on Educational Outcomes (CREDO) (2009). Multiple Choice: Charter School Performance in 16 States. Retrieved April 12, 2014 from http://credo.stanford.edu/reports/MULTIPLE_CHOICE_CREDO.pdf
8. Eckes, S.E., & Trotter, A. E. (2007). Are charter schools using recruitment strategies to increase student body diversity? Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 62-90.
9. Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G., & Wang, J. (2011). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19 (1). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/779
10. Frankenberg, E. (2011) Charter Schools: A Civil Rights Mirage? Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47 (3): 100-105.
11. Fuller, B. (2003). Education policy under cultural pluralism. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 15-24.
12. Furgeson, J., Gill, B., Haimson, J., Killewald, A., McCullough, M., Nichols-Barrer, I., Lake, R. (2012). Charter school management organizations: Diverse strategies and diverse student impacts (Updated ed.). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
13. Georgia Department of Education (2014). Charter School Basics. Retrieved from http://www.gadoe.org/external-affairs-and-policy/charter-schools/pages/general-frequently-asked-questions.aspx
14. Georgia Department of Education (2017). 2018 Charter Schools Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.gadoe.org/External-Affairs-and-Policy/Charter-Schools/Committee%20Members/2018%20Charter%20Schools%20Annual%20Report.pdf
15. Gulosino, C. & d’Entremont, C. (2011). Circles of influence: An analysis of charter school location and racial patterns at varying demographic scales. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19 (8). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/842
16. Herchinger, J. (2011, December. 22). Segregated Charter Schools Evoke Separate but Equal Era in the U.S. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-22/segregated-charter-schools-evoke-separate-but-equal-era-in-u-s-education.html
17. Institute on Race and Poverty. (2008). Failed promises: Assessing charter schools in the Twin Cities. Minneapolis: Author, University of Minnesota Law School. Retrieved from http://www.irpumn.org/uls/resources/projects/2_Charter_Report_Final.pdf
18. Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neigh- borhood. In L. Lynn Jr. & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Lewis, C. W., James, M., Hancock, S., & Hill-Jackson, V. (2008). Framing African American Students’ Success and Failure in Urban Settings A Typology for Change. Urban Education, 43(2), 127-153.
20. Lubienski, C. & Weitzel, P. (2009). Choice, integration, and educational opportunity: Evidence on competitive incentives for student sorting in charter schools. Journal of Gender, Race, & Justice, 11, 351-376.
21. Mahard, R. E., & Crain, R. L. (1983). Research on minority achievement in desegregated schools. The consequences of school desegregation, 103-125.
22. R. A. Mickelson. (2008) “Twenty-first Century Social Science Research on School Diversity and Educational Outcomes,” Ohio State Law Journal 69:1173–228.
23. Miron, G., Urschel, J.L., Mathis, W.J., & Tornquist, E. (2010). Schools without diversity: Education management organizations, charter schools and the demographic stratification of the American school system. Boulder, CO & Tempe, AZ: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit.
24. National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2014). Measuring up. Retrieved from http://www.publiccharters.org/get-the-facts/law-database/
25. Orfield, G. and Lee, C. (2004). Brown at 50: King’s dream or Plessy’s nightmare? Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
26. Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Civil Rights Project at Harvard University (The).
27. Ritter, G., Jensen, N., Kisida, B., & McGee, J. (2010). A Closer Look at Charter Schools and Segregation: Flawed Comparisons Lead to Overstated Conclusions. Education Next, 10(3), 69-73.
28. Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
29. Rushing, W. (2001). Inequality and education reform: Formulating a macro-historical sociology perspective. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 4, 29-44.
30. Schofield, J. W. (1995). Review of research on school desegregation’s impact on elementary and secondary students. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 597–616). New York: Macmillan.
31. Siegel-Hawley, G. & Frankenberg, E. (2011). Does law influence charter school diversity? An analysis of federal and state legislation. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 16, 321-376.
32. The law, § 59-40-70(D), includes a provision that allows charter school outside this range to continue operating if a monitoring board finds that the school enrolls students in a nondiscriminatory manner.
33. U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top program executive summary. Washington, DC: Author. www2.ed.gov/programs/ racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf