Research article of American Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Analysis of Non-parametric Qualities of Undergraduate Biology Examination Questions in a Nigeria University: Implications for Quality Assurance and Students’ Learning
MUSTAPHA Mohammed Tajordeen
Department of Science Education,Faculty of Education,IBB University, Lapai,Nigeria
This study employed ex-post facto research design to ascertain non-parametric qualities of past undergraduate biology examinations questions in a Nigeria university. The study covered a period of five years examination sessions from 2012/2013 to 2017/2018 but excluded 2016/2017.One hundred and seven examination question papers with a total One thousand one hundred and ninety eight mainly essay and sub-essay questions were collected for this study. Using descriptive content analysis method, the study analysed the content validity and the cognitive content of the biology examination papers. Descriptive statistics, mainly percentage was used to determine the proportion of the questions set on the content of each course in context of the National Universities Commission (NUC), Abuja, Nigeria, Benchmark for Minimum Academic Standard (BMAS, 2007) and the in-use university academic prospectus undergraduate biology curriculum. The analysis revealed;
i.80% of the content of the biology curriculum was tested and
ii.(ii) the examination tested more of lower order cognitive abilities; knowledge and comprehensive (76.11%) with deviation +36.11, application/problem solving (1.83%) and cognitive abilities; analytical, creative and evaluative thinking (22.02%); higher order total 23.85% with deviation -36.15
The implications of the findings to quality of students learning were discussed. Appropriate recommendations that could lead to improvement of the content validity of the examinations questions, increasing proportion of problem solving/application and broad range of higher level analytical, creative and evaluative thinking questions were made. It was concluded that the examination question papers could be considered suitable assessment tool that satisfy content validity but low towards the attainment of cognitive objectives of biology of the undergraduate programme. The overall finding calls for further improvement in the qualities of the examination questions.
Keywords: Non parametric qualities, biology examination questions, quality assurance, students learning
How to cite this article:
MUSTAPHA Mohammed Tajordeen. Analysis of Non-parametric Qualities of Undergraduate Biology Examination Questions in a Nigeria University: Implications for Quality Assurance and Students’ Learning.American Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 2020,5:64.
1. Amua-Sekyi, E.T. (2016). Assessment, student learning and classroom practice:Areview. Journal of Education and Practicw. 7(2!) Retrieved 2nd September, 2019 from http://www.iiste.org
2. Balogun, T.A. (1980). What West Africa Examinations Council O’ level Biology Test. Africa Journal of Examination Research, 4 (1 & 2), 23-43.
3. Best, J.W. & Kahn, J.V. (2006). Research in Education. (9th Ed.) India: Dorling Kindersley Pvt Ltd
4. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2007). Benchmark Minimum Academic Standards for Undergraduate Programmes in Nigerian University (Science). National Universities Commission, Abuja.
5. Gallagher, J. D. (1998). Classroom assessment for teachers. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall
6. Hamafyelto, R. S, Hamman-Tukur, A. & Hamafyelto, S.S. (2015). Assessing teacher competencies in test construction and content validity of teacher madeexamination questions in commerce in Borno State, Nigeria. Education, 5(5), 123-128.
7. Hamman-Tukur, A.& Kamis, A.B.(2000). Content analysis of the Biochemistryexaminationquestions:Implication for testing, teaching and development. African Journal of Resaerch in Education, (1) 59-62.
8. IBBUL (2019). Quality Assurance Framework of Educational Processes.
9. Joe-Kinanee,J. N. & Opara, I.M. (2017)Psychometric propertiesof languagein JSSCE examination questions in River state. International Journal of Scientific Reasearch in Education. 10(5), 577-589. Retrieved 7th September, 2019 from http://www.ijsre.com
10. Malmfors, B. (2006). Teaching methods and science communication. In: Animal Genetics Training Resource, Retrieved 18th June, 2014 from www.agtri.ilri.cgiar.org/index.php?option=com content & view article & id….
11. Mustapha, M.T. (2000). A study of examination questions used in the assessment of pre- service science teachers. The Nigerian Teacher Today, 8 (1&2), 114-123.
12. Mustapha, M.T. (2013). Analysis of non-parametric qualities of National Examination Council (NECO) Biology Examinations. African Journal of Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (AJSTME).
13. Oluoch-Suleh, E. (2014. Challenges by tutors in setting of examinations. Journal of Education and Practice. 5(17)
14. Perrot, E.(1982). Effective teaching: A practical guide to improving your teaching, London, Longman
15. Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students learning approaches. Journal of High Education, 35(2), online. Retrieved on 20th June, 2014 from jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3448270?uid=…
16. Scouller, K. (2000). The influence of assessment on students learning. Paper presented at the AARE annual conference, Sydney Retrieved on 22nd June 2014 from aare.edu.au/data/publications/2000/sc000195 pdf
17. World Bank Working Report No. 124 (1999/2000).
18. Stiggins, R. J. & Conklin, n. F. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practices of classroom. Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
19. Rudner, L. M. & Schafer, W. D. (Eds.) (2002). What teachers need to know about assessment. Washington, D.C:National Education Association
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.