SEMI-RIGID LUMBAR SPINE FIXATION WITH PEEK RODS AS A TREATMENT OPTION FOR MONO-SEGMENTAL DEGENERATIVE DISK DISEASE


Semi-rigid lumbar spine fixation with PEEK rods as a treatment option for mono-segmental degenerative disk disease


Michael Winking MD, PhD1*, Mags Wigram PhD1

1Spine Center, Klinikum Osnabrueck, Am Finkenhuegel 3 D-49076 Osnabrueck, Germany.


Long lasting back pain due to degenerative disc disease is one of the major reasons for reduced quality of life and work incapacity. In some of these patients conservative treatment will not improve back pain significantly. Therefore fusion surgery as a surgical option is offered to these patients. The main aim of this kind of treatment is the reduction of segmental motion leading to an improvement in pain. Rigid fixation leads to high fusion rates but may also contribute to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration.

Therefore a semi-rigid stabilization with PEEK rods may be an option because it is associated with less implant related rigidity and is a less invasive procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the improvement in back pain after minimally invasive semi-rigid lumbar stabilization with screws and PEEK rods in 45 patients and to identify potential implant failures during a follow up of two years. Six weeks after surgery the patients showed a significant improvement in their back pain, which persisted during the whole observation time of two years (p<0.01). All patients who were still in working life returned to their jobs without extended work incapacity. No implant related complication associated with the surgical procedure was detected. During the follow up time of two years no implant failure was observed.


Keywords: PEEK rods; Semi-rigid stabilization; Lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD); Lumbar fusion; Chronic low back pain

Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Michael Winking, Mags Wigram. Semi-rigid lumbar spine fixation with PEEK rods as a treatment option for mono-segmental degenerative disk disease. American Journal of Orthopedic Research and Reviews, 2020; 3:15. DOI: 10.28933/ajorr-2020-10-1905


References:

1. Anderson GBJ, Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999. 354: p. 581-585.
2. Bachmeier BE, Nerlich AG, Weiler C, Paesold G, Jochum M, Boos N, Analysis of Tissue Distribution of TNF-Alpha, TNF-Alpha-Receptors, and the Activating TNF-Alpha-Converting Enzyme Sug-gests Activation of the TNF-Alpha System in the Aging Intervertebral Disc. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2007(1096): p. 44-54
3. Benezech J, Garlenq B, Larroque G, Flexible Stabilization of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine Using PEEK Rods. Adv. In Orthopedics, 2016. 7369409(2016).
4. Burke JG, Watson RW, Conhyea D, McCormack D, Dowling FE, Walsh MG, Fitzpatrick JM Human Nucleus Pulposis Can Respond to a Pro-Inflammatory Stimulus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003. 28: p. 2685-2693.
5. Cohen SP, Doshi TL, Constantinescu OC, Zhao Z, Kurihara C, Larkin TM, Griffith SR, Jacobs MB, Kroski WJ, Dawson TC, Fowler IM, White RL, Verdun AJ, Jamison DE, Anderson-White M, Shank SE, Pasquina PF, Effectiveness of Lumbar Facet Joint Blocks and Predictive Value before Radiofrequency Denervation: The Facet Treatment Study (FACTS), a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology, 2018. 129(3): p. 517-535.
6. Dickey JP, Pierrynowski MR, Bednar DA, Yang SX, Relationship between pain and vertebral motion in chronic low-back pain subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2002 17(5): p. 345-352.
7. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group, Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001. 26: p. 2521-2534
8. Jensen RK, Kent P, Jensen TS, Kjaer P, The association between subgroups of MRI findings identified with latent class analysis and low back pain in 40-year-old Danes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2018. 19: p. 62.
9. Kang HS, Kang JD, Stefanovic-Racic M, McIntyre LA, Georgescu HI, Evans CH, Toward a Biochemical Understanding of Human Intervertebral Disc Degeneration and Herniation. Contributions of Nitric Oxide, Interleukins, Prostaglandin E2, and Matrix Metalloproteinases Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997. 22: p. 1065-1073.
10. Kendall, N., Low Back Pain: Treatment and Prevention. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 1997. 5(3): p. 134-139.
11. Kim TY, Kang KT, Yoon DH, Shin HC, Kim KN, Yi S, Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: differences between surgical techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012. 37: p. 1456-1462.
12. Kowalski RJ, Ferrara LA, Benzel EC, Biomechanics of bone fusion. Neurosurgical Focus, 2001. 10(4): p. article E2.
13. Li C, Liu L, Shi JY, Yan KZ, Shen WZ, Yang ZR, Clinical and biomechanical researches of 10 polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods for semi-rigid lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev, 2018. 41: p. 375-389
14. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA, Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007. 32: p. 2119-2126.
15. Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, Traeger AC, Lin CC, Chenot JF, van Tulder M, Koes BW, Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J, 2018 27(11): p. 2791-2803.
16. Pasciak M, Grzywocz J, Nobis A, Pala A, Wadek T, PEEK plastic rods versus titanium stiff rods in transpedicular lumbar stabilization. Clinical comparison of short term results. ESJ 2009. 18: p. 471-535.
17. Ponnapan RK, Serhan H, Zarda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR, Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. The Spine Journal 2009. 9: p. 263-267.
18. Qi L, Li M, Zhang S, Xue J, Si H,, Comparative effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion: a preliminary report. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2013. 155: p. 1187-1193.
19. Rajasekaran S, Assessment of Status of End Plate and Diffusion in Degenerative Disc Disease, in Surgery for Low Back Pain, G.R. Szpalski M, Rydevik BL, Le Huec JC, Mayer HM, Editor. 2010, Springer. p. 47-55.
20. Schwab FJ, Nazarian DG, Mahmud F, Michelsen CB, Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1995. 20: p. 2023-2029.
21. Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, Chuter V, Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Clin Rehabil, 2015 29(12): p. 1155-1167.
22. Selim A, Mercer S, Fang F, Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Rods for Lumbar Fusion: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International J of Spine Surg, 2018. 12: p. 190-200
23. Turner JL, Paller DJ, Murrell CB, The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010. 35: p. E1076-E1082.
24. Vadapalli S, Sairyo V, Goel K, Robon M, Biyani A, Khandha A, Ebraheim NA, Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion – a finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006. 31 p. E992-E998.
25. Willems P, Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion. Acta Orthop Suppl, 2013 84(349): p. 1-35.
26. Xu L, Chu B, Feng Y, Xu F, Zou YF, Modic changes in lumbar spine: prevalence and distribution patterns of end plate oedema and end plate sclerosis. Br J Radiol, 2016. 89: p. 20150650.
27. Yoshida M, Nakamura T, Sei A, Kikuchi T, Takagi K, Matsukawa A, Intervertebral disc calls produce tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1beta, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 immediately after herniation: an experimental study using a new hernia model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005. 20: p. 55-61
28. Zhou ZJ, Zhao FD, Fang XQ, Zhao K, Fan SW, Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 15(3): p. 295-310.