Research Article of American Journal of Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Motion and its Effects on the Cement Mantle – A Biomechanical Analysis of Femoral Stem Displacement during Implant Cementation
Michael P. Ast, MD1; Adam Gitlin, MD2; Nadeen O. Chahine, PhD3; Daniel Grande, PhD4; Peter Lementowski, MD5
1Hospital of Special Surgery, New York, NY; 2University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL; 3Department of Biomechanics, Columbia Uni-versity, New York, NY; 4Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY; 5Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
Background: It is a common notion that motion of a femoral component during cementation should be avoided as it may weaken the cement mantle. We created an in vitro model of cemented femoral components and subjected them to varying rotational motion during the cement curing process, to measure the effect on the pullout strength of the stem.
Methods: 21 sawbones femurs were separated into four groups. The first group served as control and was cemented in a standard fashion. The remainder of the stems were divided into groups and subjected to angular rotational displacement within the cement mantle during curing . Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained of each model to evaluate for cement defects. Pullout strength testing was performed.
Results: Despite rotational displacement, no cement defects were noted on imaging. The control stems showed an average pullout strength of 3735.79N. The experimental groups showed a trend for lower failure loads but it was not statistically significant (P=0.063). Of the 21 stems tested, three encountered cement mantle failure and associated stem pullout and the remainder failed by peripros-thetic fracture.
Conclusion: Despite conventional thinking that rotational displacement during the cementing process leading to disruption of the cement mantle integrity, this was not borne out in our study. This should give surgeons confidence that in the set-ting of unintended rotational displacement of a femoral stem, returning the stem to its original position does not significantly compromise the integrity of the cement mantle or the pullout strength of the femoral implant. Small displacement of the femoral stem with prompt correction during cement curing does not cause evident cement mantle defects or a loss of femoral stem pullout strength.
Keywords: cement mantle, hemiarthroplasty, cemented total hip arthroplasty, pullout strength, cement technique
How to cite this article:
Michael P. Ast; Adam Gitlin; Nadeen O. Chahine; Daniel Grande,; Peter Lementowski.Motion and its Effects on the Cement Mantle – A Biomechanical Analysis of Femoral Stem Displacement during Implant Cementation. American Journal of Orthopedic Research and Reviews, 2021, 4:23. DOI: 10.28933/ajorr-2021-06-1805
1. Staal HM, Heyligers IC, Sluijs JA van der. Stem displacement during reduction of a dislocated cemented total hip arthroplasty with a polished tapered stem. J Arthroplasty 2000;15(7):944–946.
2. Petracchi M, Della Valle AG, Buttaro M, Piccaluga F. Displacement of a cemented polished tapered stem during closed reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty–a case report. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73(4):475–477.
3. Blacha J. [Polished stem displacement from a cement mantle–a case report]. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2004;69(6):417–418.
4. Shepard MF, Kabo JM, Lieberman JR. The Frank Stinchfield Award. Influence of cement technique on the interface strength of femoral components. Clin Orthop 2000;(381):26–35.
5. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74(3):385–389.
6. Valdivia GG, Dunbar MJ, Parker DA, Woolfrey MR, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, et al. The John Charnley Award: Three-dimensional analysis of the cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;(393):38–51.
7. Subramanian KN, Temple AJ, Evans S, John A. Pull-out strength of a polished tapered stem is improved by placing bone cement over the shoulder of the implant. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(1):139–143.
8. Zhang H, Brown LT, Blunt LA, Barrans SM. Influence of femoral stem surface finish on the apparent static shear strength at the stem-cement interface. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2008;1(1):96–104.