Susan E. Baer, Ph.D.1*, Victor Ferreros, Ph.D.1

1Walden University, Contributing Faculty Member, School of Public Policy and Administration.

The COVID-19 pandemic has shined a light on the importance of housing as a social determinant of health. To prevent millions of American renters from being evicted from their homes during the COVID-19 pandemic and potentially becoming homeless, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a temporary eviction ban order on September 4, 2020 that has currently been extended through June 30, 2021. This paper examines the rationale for the CDC temporary eviction ban order from a public health perspective. It then uses statistical techniques to explore the relationship between political and demographic variables and temporary eviction bans enacted in individual states during the pandemic. Results show a statistically significant relationship between political party control of the state legislature and temporary state eviction bans which suggests that partisanship has largely driven the use of temporary eviction bans as a policy response to COVID-19 at the state level.

Keywords: Eviction ban; Eviction moratorium; Eviction; COVID- 19; Homelessness; Partisanship

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:
Susan E. Baer, Victor Ferreros. State Eviction Bans: A Policy Response to COVID-19. American Journal of Public Administration, 2021; 3:11. DOI: 10.28933/ajpa-2021-04-1805


1. Alarcon, J. & Khan, T.V. (2021). Adapting backpack medicine in COVID-19 response for people experiencing homelessness in Southern California. American Journal of Public Health, 111(1), 58-61.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021, January 29). Order under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264) and 42 Code of Federal Regulations 70.2.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021b). Accessed April 15, 2021.
4. Conlan, T. & Posner, P. (2011). Inflection point? Federalism and the Obama administration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(3), 421-446. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjr020
5. Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted. Broadway Books.
6. Desmond, M. & Kimbro, R.T. (2015). Eviction’s fallout: Housing, hardship, and health. Social Forces, 94(1), 295-324. doi: 10.1093/sf/sov044
7. Gusmano, M., Miller, E., Nadash, P., & Simpson, E. (2020). Partisanship in initial state responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. World Medical and Health Policy, 12(4), 380-389. doi: 10.1002/ wmh3.372
8. Ha, Y.P., McDonald, N., Hersh, S., Fenniri, S.R., Hillier, A., & Cannuscio, C.C. (2021). Using informational murals and handwashing stations to increase access to sanitation among people experiencing homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Public Health, 111(1), 50-53.
9. Perri, M., Dosani, N., & Hwang, S. (2020). COVID-19 and people experiencing home- lessness: Challenges and mitigation strategies. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 192(26), E716 – E719. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200834
10. Stewart, N. (2020, November 13). It’s a time bomb: 23 die as virus hits packed homeless shelters. The New York Times.
11. Thompson, F. & Gusmano, M. (2014). The administrative presidency and fractious federalism: The case of Obamacare. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 44(3), 426-450. doi: 10.1093/publius/pju011
12. Thompson, F., Gusmano, M., & Shinohara, S. (2018). Trump and the affordable care act: Congressional repeal efforts, executive federa- lism, and program durability. Publius: The Jour- nal of Federalism, 48(3), 396-424. doi: 10.1093/ publius/pjy007
13. Van Green, T. & Tyson, A. (2020). 5 facts about partisan reactions to COVID-19 in the U.S. Pew Research Center. Accessed February 19, 2021.

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details)

CC BY 4.0
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.