The wood decomposition system and community diversity of fungi


The wood decomposition system and community diversity of fungi


Xiaorui Tao1*, Zhongjun Zhu2, Yaobing Ding1, Xinhao Li1

1College of Economics & Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China. 2College of Literature & Media, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China.


Fungi are critical agents of the global carbon cycle, however, our ability to link fungal community composition to ecosystem functioning is constrained by a limited understanding the wood decomposition rates of fungus. Here we examined the wood decomposition rate of fungus and the impact of fungal community diversity on the wood decomposing. To understand the relationship between the wood decomposition rate and the traits of fungi, we introduced 37 types of fungus into the wood decomposition system and set the growth rate and moisture tolerance of fungus as the explanatory variables. In addition, we constructed the competition, parasitic and symbiotic model based on Malthus-block growth comprehensive to analyze and predict the interactions between different fungus. The entropy weight-TOPSIS model was established to understand the biodiversity of fungus and obtain the relative dominance degree which can reflect the advantages and disadvantages of different fungus. The ARIMA model was used in five different environments to predict the impact of fungal community diversity on the overall efficiency of wood decomposing. Our research can not only help us to better understand the fungus community, but also significant for improving the quality of climate and the carbon cycle.


Keywords: Fungi; Malthus-Retarded growth; Entropy weight-TOPSIS; ARIMA

Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Xiaorui Tao, Zhongjun Zhu, Yaobin-g Ding, Xinhao Li. The wood decomposition system and community diversity of fungi. Advances in Research and Reviews, 2021; 2:13. DOI: 10.28933/arr-2021-03-1005


References:

1. Lustenhouwer, N., Maynard, D. S., Bradford, M. A., Lindner, D. L., Oberle, B., Zanne, A. E., & Crowther, T. W. (2020). A trait-based under-standing of wood decomposition by fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci-ences of the United States of America, 117 (21).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909166117.
2. Maynard, D. S., Bradford, M. A., Covey, K. R., Lindner, D., Glaeser, J., Talbert, D. A., … Crowther, T. W. (2019). Consistent trade-offs in fungal trait expression across broad spatial scales. Nature Microbiology, 4(5), 846–853.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0361-5.
3. Lennon, J. T., Aanderud, Z. T., Lehmkuhl, B. K.,& Schoolmaster, D. R. (2012). Mapping the niche space of soil microorganisms using taxonomy and traits. Ecology, 93(8), 1867– 1879. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1745.1.
4. Jeffries, P. (1995). Biology and ecology of mycoparasitism. Canadian Journal of Botany, 73(Suppl. 1). https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-389.
5. Pouska, V., Macek, P., Zíbarová, L., & Ostrow, H. (2017). How does the richness of wood-decaying fungi relate to wood microcli-mate? Fungal Ecology, 27, 178–181.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2016.06.006.
6. Nguyen, J., Lara-Gutiérrez, J., & Stocker, R.(2020). Environmental fluctuations and their effects on microbial communities, populations and individuals. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuaa068.
7. Goodell, B., Winandy, J. E., & Morrell, J. J. (2020, December 1). Fungal degradation of wood: Emerging data, new insights and changing perceptions. Coatings. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10121210.
8. Temnuhin, V. B. (1996). Preliminary quanti-tative estimation of wood decomposition by fungi in a Russian temperate pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 81(1–3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03660-1.
9. Ehrlich, I., & Lui, F. (1997). The problem of population and growth: A review of the literature from Malthus to contemporary models of endogenous population and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(1), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(95)00930-2.
10. Kareiva, P. (1990). Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philosophical Transactions – Royal Society of London, B, 330(1257), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0191.
11. Zhang, G., McAdams, D. A., Shankar, V., & Darani, M. M. (2018). Technology evolution prediction using lotka-volterra equations. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 140(6).https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039448.
12. Sonveaux, P., Végran, F., Schroeder, T.,Wergin, M. C., Verrax, J., Rabbani, Z. N., … Dewhirst, M. W. (2008). Targeting lactate-fueled respiration selectively kills hypoxic tu-mor cells in mice. Journal of Clinical Investi-gation, 118(12), 3930–3942.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI36843.
13. Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1.
14. Zhang, P. G. (2003). Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing, 50, 159–175.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00702-0.
15. Riley, R., Salamov, A. A., Brown, D. W., Nagy, L. G., Floudas, D., Held, B. W., … Grigoriev, I. V. (2014). Extensive sampling of basidiomycete genomes demonstrates inadequacy of the white-rot/brown-rot paradigm for wood decay fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(27), 9923–9928.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400592111.
16. Moorhead, D. L., & Sinsabaugh, R. L. (2006). A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecological Monographs, 76(2), 151–174.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0 151:ATMOLD]2.0.CO;2.