Research Article of Global journal of Economics and Business Administration
Impact of Implementing IPSAS on Public Organizations in Lebanon: An Empirical Study
Hasan El-Mousawi1 and Amar Sayed-Ahmad2
1Associate Professor, Lebanese University
2Instructor, Lebanese University
Reform in the public sector organizations starts with reforming the accounting information system. The idea of reform boosted the attempts of certain countries to take steps toward developing the accounting systems in their managements in order to improve their efficiency and to cope with the fast political and economic changes in addition to satisfying the public opinion about getting better services. International organizations, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have realized the importance of improving the efficiency of the public sector to improve development rates in developing countries and to get international grants and loans. Thus, a unified way to communicate among countries was needed. This study investigates the impact and impediments of implementing International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) in Lebanon. The researchers adopted the analytical descriptive approach utilizing an empirical study. A questionnaire was constructed and distributed among a sample of Lebanese certified public accountants. The research yielded some important findings mainly that adopting and implementing IPSAS lead to the advancement in the qualitative characteristics of financial statements in public organizations in Lebanon. It also concluded that there are some obstacles in adopting and implementing IPSAS in public organizations in Lebanon.
Keywords: public sector, financial statements, financial performance, public organizations, IPSAS
How to cite this article:
Hasan El-Mousawi and Amar Sayed-Ahmad. Impact of Implementing IPSAS on Public Organizations in Lebanon: An Empirical Study. Global journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2019, 3:18. DOI: 10.28933/gjeba-2019-07-0208
1. Adhikari, P., & Nesbakk, L., (2016). Implementing Public Sector Accruals in OECD Member States: Major Issues and Challenges, Accounting Forum, Vol. 40, no. 2, pp: 125-142.
2. Bastani, P., Abolhalaj, M., Jelodar, H.M., & Ramezanian, M. (2012). Role of Accrual Accounting in Report Transparency and Accountability Promotion in Iranian Public Health Sector, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 12 no. 8 pp: 1097-1101.
3. Deaconu, A., Nistor, C.S. and Filip, C.I., (2009). The Effect of Transiting from Cash Accounting to Accrual Accounting on Performance in the Public Sector, Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Oeconomica, Vol. 54, pp. 115-129.
4. Deloite, (2019). IPSAS in Your Pocket. Available for download at https://www.iasplus.com/en/publications/public-sector/ipsas-in-your-pocket-2019 [Accessed on Mar. 15th, 2019].
5. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W., (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 no. 2, pp: 147- 160.
6. Gillibrand, A. and Hilton, B., (1998). Resource Accounting and Budgeting: Principles, Concepts and Practice – The MoD Case, Public Money and Management, Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 21-28.
7. Goddard, A., (2010). Contemporary Public Sector Accounting Research—An International Comparison of Journal Papers, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 42 no. 2, pp: 75-87.
8. Guthrie, J., (1998). Application of Accrual Accounting in the Australian Public Sector – Rhetoric or Reality?, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-19.
9. Guthrie, J., Olson, O. and Humphrey, C., (1999). Debating Developments in New Public Financial Management: The Limits of Global Theorizing and Some New Ways Forward, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 209-228.
10. Hodges, R. and Mellett, H., (2003). Reporting Public Sector Financial Results, Public Management Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp: 99-113.
11. Ijeoma, N.B. & Oghoghomeh, T., (2014). Adoption of International Public Sector Accounting Standards in Nigeria: Expectations, Benefits and Challenges. Journal of Investment and Management, Vol.3, no. 1, pp: 21-29.
12. IPSASB, July 2105. Exposure Draft 56: The Applicability of IPSASs. IFAC Publications. Available at https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IPSASB-Exposure-Draft-56-The-Applicability-of-IPSASs.pdf [Accessed Apr. 20th, 2019].
13. Jacobs, K., (2012). Making Sense of Social Practice: Theoretical Pluralism in Public Sector Accounting Research, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 28 no. 1, pp: 1-25.
14. Jagalla, T., Becker, S., & Weber, J., (2011). A Taxonomy of the Perceived Benefits of Accrual Accounting and Budgeting: Evidence from German States, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 27, no. 2, pp: 134-165.
15. Lapsley, I., (1999). Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Efficiency or a Rationalizing Modernity?, Financial Accountability Management, Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 201-207.
16. Lapsley, I., Mussari, R., & Paulsson, G., (2009). On the Adoption of Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector: A Self-Evident and Problematic Reform, European Accounting Review, Vol. 18 no. 4, pp: 719-723.
17. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B., (1977). Institutional Organizations: Formal Structures As Myth and Ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83 no. 2, pp: 340-363.
18. Nistor, C.S., Deaconu, A. and Cirstea, A., (2010). Study Concerning the Level of Closeness between the Romanian Public Accounting System and IPSAS Referential, International Journal of Business Research, Vol. 10, pp. 155-178.
19. Nistor, C.S., Deaconu, A. and Severin, A., (2009). Stability and Coherence in Transition, a Wish That Can Be Accomplished? The Accounting System of Romanian Public Institutions, Journal of International Business and Economics, Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 106-124.
20. Okungu, T. O., (2015). The Impact of Implementation of International Public Sector Accounting Standards on Financial Reporting in Public Sector in Kenya, University of Nairobi Research Archive, http://hdl.handle.net/11295/94470 [Accessed Apr. 12th, 2019].
21. Olayinka, E; Okoye, L. U; Nwannwka J. M.; and Olaoye, O., (2016). International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) Adoption and Quality of Financial Reporting in the Nigerian Public Sector.ESUT Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 7, no. 2, pp: 22-30
22. Olson, O., Humphrey, C. and Guthrie, J., (2001). Caught in an Evaluatory Trap: A Dilemma for Public Services under NPFM.European Accounting Review, Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 505-522.
23. Otunla, J.O. (2014), The Implementation of The International Public Sector Accounting Standards In Nigeria: The Journey so Far. A Presentation at the Annual Accountants’ Conference of ICAN.
24. Ouda, H., (2004) Basic Requirements Model For Successful Implementation Of Accrual Accounting In The Public Sector, Public Fund Digest, Vol. 4, No. 1 pp: 78-99.
25. Pallot, J., (2001). A Decade in Review: New Zealand’s Experience with Resource Accounting and Budgeting, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 383-400.
26. Perrin, J., (1998). Resource Accounting and Budgeting: From Cash to Accruals in 25 Years, Public Money and Management, Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 7-10.
27. Sutcliffe, P., (2003). The Standards Programme of IFAC’s Public Sector Committee, Public Money and Management, Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 29-36.
28. Van der Hoek, M.P.,(2005). From Cash to Accrual Budgeting and Accounting in the Public Sector: The Dutch Experience, Public Budgeting and Finance, Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 32-45.
29. Van Helden, J., Johnsen, A., & Vakkuri, J., (2008). Distinctive Research Patterns on Public Sector Management Accounting Research, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 26 no. 2, pp: 213-240.
30. Wynne, A. 2007. Is the Move to Accrual Based Accounting a Real Priority for Public Sector Accounting. Public Fund Digest, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1320219) [Accessed Apr. 18th, 2019].
31. Yamamoto, K., (1999). Accounting System Reform in Japanese Local Governments, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 291-307.