EFFECTS OF FACTORS OF INFORMAL CARE ON THE UTILIZATION OF SOCIAL CARE INSURANCE BENEFITS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY


Effects of factors of informal care on the utilization of social care insurance benefits: A cross-sectional study


Jenny Rueffer1*, Silke Geithner2, Goetz Schneiderat2, Tom Schaal1

1Department of Health and Care Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Zwickau, Kornmarkt 1,  Zwickau, Saxony, Germany. 2University of Applied Sciences for Social Work, Education and Care, Duererstr. 25, Dresden, Saxony.


Background: Presently in Germany, as there is a shortage of nursing staff, informal caregivers have become highly relevant. Because they often deal with care related burden, legislation was passed to improve caregivers’ situations by offering more supports. Nonetheless, a considerable percentage of caregivers do not utilize it.

Methods: Data was collected in Saxony (Germany) from November 2019 to December 2019 by using an online survey and a postal survey (cross-sectional study design; n= 1,716). For analysis bivariate logistic regression (forward method LR, α≤0.05) was performed.

Results: The average age of the sample was 61.9 years, 52.9% were female and 45.7% male. Results indicate a medium utilization of care insurance services. Considerable associations were time spent on care and utilization of care allowance (OR: 1.77), such as duration of care degree and utilization of residential care services (OR: 1.88) and substitute care (OR: 1.81).

Conclusions: Informal caregivers putting intensive effort into care do tend to utilize services. The resulting questions of why newer informal caregivers do not tend to utilize services and why there is a medium utilization among all caregivers implies that people need to gain better access to services independently of care factors.


Keywords: Informal care; Care Insurance; Services utilization

Free Full-text PDF


How to cite this article:
Jenny Rueffer, Silke Geithner, Goetz Schneiderat, Tom Schaal. Effects of factors of informal care on the utilization of social care insurance benefits: A cross-sectional study. Global Journal of Nursing , 2020; 3:17. DOI: 10.28933/gjn-2020-10-2506


References:

1. Continentale health insurance a.G. (2016): Continentale study 2016. Caring relatives: between exhaustion, love and conscientiousness, Dortmund. (Continentale Krankenversicherung a.G. (2016): Continentale-Studie 2016. Pflegende Angehörige: zwischen Erschöpfung, Liebe und Pflichtgefühl, Dortmund.)
2. Deutskens, E.; de Ruyter, K.; Wetzels, M. et al. (2004): Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study. Marketing Letters 15, 21–36 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00
3. Federal Ministry of Health: Care insurance, numbers and facts. Benefit recipients 1995 – 2018. Recipients of social care insurance benefits on annual average by benefit types. (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Pflegeversicherung Zahlen und Fakten. Leistungsempfänger 1995 – 2018. Leistungsempfänger der sozialen Pflegeversicherung im Jahresdurchschnitt nach Leistungsarten.)
4. Federal Ministry of Health: Care insurance, numbers and facts. Numbers and facts about social care insurance, Effective: 02/2020. (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Pflegeversicherung, Zahlen und Fakten. Zahlen und Fakten zur Pflegeversicherung, Stand: 02/2020.)
5. Federal Ministry of Health: Care insurance, numbers and facts. Social care insurance. Benefit recipients by benefit types and care degree on annual average 2018. (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Pflegeversicherung, Zahlen und Fakten. Soziale Pflegeversicherung. Leistungsempfänger nach Leistungsarten und Pflegegraden im Jahresdurchschnitt 2018.)
6. Federal Ministry of Health (2016): Practice pages care 08/2016. 3. Edition. (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (2016): Praxisseiten Pflege 08/2016. 3. Auflage.)
7. Federal Statistical Office (2017): Care statistics 2015, Care within the frame of social care insurance German results. Wiesbaden 2017, article number: 5224001-15900-4 (Statistisches Bundesamt (2017): Pflegestatistik 2015, Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung Deutschlandergebnisse. Wiesbaden 2017, Artikelnummer: 5224001-15900-4)
8. Geyer, Johannes; Schulz, Erika (2014): Who cares? The meaning of informal care by the working population in Germany. DIW weekly report number 14. Berlin, p.294-301. (Geyer, Johannes; Schulz, Erika (2014): Who cares? Die Bedeutung der informellen Pflege durch Erwerbstätige in Deutschland. DIW Wochenbericht Nr.14. Berlin, S.294-301.)
9. Hielscher, Volker; Kirchen-Peters, Sabine; Nock, Lukas (2017): Care in one’s own four walls, study of the Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Düsseldorf. from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/167575 (Hielscher, Volker; Kirchen-Peters, Sabine; Nock, Lukas (2017): Pflege in den eigenen vier Wänden, Studie der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Düsseldorf. from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/167575)
10. Kaldenberg, D.; Koenig, H.; Becker, B. (1994): Mail Survey Response Rate Patterns in a Population of the Elderly: Does Response Deteriorate with Age? The Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(1), 68-76. Retrieved May 7, 2020. from www.jstor.org/stable/2749424
11. Levin, K. Study Design 3 (2006): Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry 7. 24-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375
12. Lüdecke, Daniel; Mnich, Eva; Kofahl, Christopher (2012): The impact of sociodemographic factors on the utilisation of support services for family care givers of elderly dependents – results from the German sample of the EUROFAMCARE study. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 2012,9: Doc06. doi: 10.3205/psm000084
13. Mann, C.J. (2012): Observational research methods – Cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and case-control studies. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2, 38-46. https://doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2011.12.004
14. Metzelthin, S.F.; Verbakel, E.; Veenstra, M.Y. et al. (2017): Positive and negative outcomes of informal caregiving at home and in institutionalised long-term care: a cross sectional study. BMC Geriatrics 17, 232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0620-3
15. Meyer, Martha (2006): Caring relatives in Germany. An overview about the current situation and prospective developments. Lit Verlag (Berlin, Münster, Wien, Zürich, London). ISBN 978-3-8258-9921-9. CH: 22,90 sFr. (Meyer, Martha (2006): Pflegende Angehörige in Deutschland. Ein Überblick über den derzeitigen Stand und zukünftige Entwicklungen. Lit Verlag (Berlin, Münster, Wien, Zürich, London). ISBN 978-3-8258-9921-9. CH: 22,90 sFr.)
16. Pinquart, M.; Sörensen, S. (2003): Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2). 250-267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.250
17. Saxon State Ministry of Social Affairs and Consumer Protection: The Care package Saxony. https://www.pflegenetz.sachsen.de/pflegepaket.html, Effective: 05/2020. (Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Soziales und Verbraucherschutz: Das Pflegepaket Sachsen. https://www.pflegenetz.sachsen.de/pflegepaket.html, Stand: 05/2020.)
18. Schneekloth Ulrich, Müller Udo (2000): Effects of care insurance. Series of the Federal Ministry of Health, Band 127. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. (Schneekloth Ulrich, Müller Udo (2000): Wirkungen der Pflegeversicherung. Schriftenreihe
19. des BMG, Band 127. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.)
20. Sverdrup, K.; Bergh, S.; Selbaek, G. et al. (2018): Mobility and cognition at admission to the nursing home – a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics 18, 30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0724-4
21. Telenius, E.W.; Engedal, K.; Bergland, A. (2013): Physical Performance and Quality of Life of Nursing-Home residents with Mild and Moderate Dementia. International journal of environmental research and public health, 10(12), 6672-6686. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10126672
22. The Eleventh Code of Social Law – Social Care Insurance (Das Elfte Buch Sozialgesetzbuch – Soziale Krankenversicherung) – (Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 26. Mai 1994, BGBl. I S. 1014, 1015), das zuletzt durch Artikel 2a des Gesetzes vom 4. März 2020 (BGBl. I S. 437) geändert worden ist.
23. Verbakel, E.; Metzelthin, S.F.; Kempen, G. (2018): Caregiving to Older Adults: Determinants of Informal Caregivers’ Subjective Well-being and Formal and Informal Support as Alleviating Conditions. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Vol.73. 6. 1099-1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw047
24. Wetzstein, M.; Rommel, A.; Lange, C. (2015): Caring relatives – Germanys dominant nursing service, Hrsg. Robert Koch–Institut, Berlin. GBE kompakt 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2016-018 (Wetzstein, M.; Rommel, A.; Lange, C. (2015): Pflegende Angehörige – Deutschlands größter Pflegedienst, Hrsg. Robert Koch–Institut, Berlin. GBE kompakt 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2016-018)