Global Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research


Research article of Global Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research Comparative study ultrasound guided abdominal field blocks versus port infiltration in laparoscopic cholecystectomies for post-operative pain relief Shazia Shafi1, *Nusrat Jehan2,  Kouser  Benazir 3 1Senior Resident, Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Govt. Medical College, Srinagar, India.2Associate professor, Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Govt. Medical College, Srinagar, India.3Consultant, Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Govt. Medical College, Srinagar, India. Background and Aims: Effective post‑operative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is important because it facilitates early amelioration, ambulation and short hospital stay. Aim: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided abdominal field blocks with port site infiltration with ropivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: An observational study was conducted in the Postgraduate Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine in collaboration with the Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Srinagar from October 2017 – December 2018. Patients were randomised into two groups to receive either local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopy port sites (n = 40, Group A/standard group) and  USAFBs (n = 40, Group B/study group) using a total dose of 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% with sterile technique. Randomisation was done by flipping of coin method. The primary objective was to measure magnitude of pain in first 24 hours using numeric rating scores (NRS). To estimate opioid consumption in first 24 hours postoperatively. To assess the quality of pain relief and patient satisfaction on a four point Patient satisfaction scale.  Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 21. Data were compared using the Chi‑square test and students’ t‑test. Results: Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group B than group A. Upon inter group comparison of A vs. B the results were statistically significant (p value <0.001). At all time in 24 hrs. Postoperative period (1, 2, ...


Review article of Global Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research Ganglion Impar block through Transsacrococcygeal Approach For Management Of Chronic Perineal Pain Dipika Patel, Nita Gosai Department of Anaesthesia Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat India The ganglion Impar is an unpaired sympathetic structure located at the level of the Sacrococcygeal joint. The modified technique replaced the previously using technique of the Impar block via the horizontal approach through the anococcygeal ligament. Modified technique of Ganglion Impar block through transsacroccygeal approach is easy to perform and give maximum pain relief with margin of safety. Aims and objectives To study, 1) Ease and complications of Impar block through trans- sacrococcygeal approach 2) The analgesic efficacy of Impar block, 3) Duration of analgesic effect of Impar block Method In this retrospective study,15 patients who had chronic perineal pain had given ganglion Impar block.., The ganglion Impar block was given through trans-sacrococcygeal approach, After written and informed consent, patient was asked to lie down on his abdomen, facing down with a pillow under the pelvis to help flatten out the lower lumber spine’s natural curvature. Skin was infiltrate with local anaesthetic, after proper aseptic precautions. The needle is advanced under fluoroscopy guidance until correct needle placement is obtained. Once position is confirmed, therapeutic block is performed with administration of 2ml of 100% absolute alcohol after confirming 50% reduction in VAS from baseline with diagnostic block (0.125% Bupivacaine 5 ml). Attempts of procedure were recorded in all patients. VAS was assessed after 12 and 24 hours. Patients were discharged after 24 hours, asked to report every week and whenever VAS is more than 4 for 3 months Result Fifteen patients with advanced cancer with perineal pain who were not responding to pharmacotherapy treatment received a neurolytic ganglion Impar block through trans-sacrococcygeal ...


Research article of Global Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research HEALTH OF THE WORK OF THE COMMUNITY HEALTH AND ENDEMY AGENT OF THE MESSIA ALAGOAS Ariana da Silva Santos¹*, Simone Farias dos Santos², Ana Patrícia da Silva Santos³, Katia Januário da Silva4, Ana Quitéria da Silva5, Eliane Buarque de Melo Ferreira6. 123456 Núcleo de Apoio à Saúde da Família Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Messias Alagoas Introduction The project of valorization of the workers of the Municipal Health Secretariat of the city of Messias brings as priority the worker health of the community health agent and of endemics. The project was created according to the reports of the professional daily target audience during conversation rounds, which shared the need for a broader attention to the working and health conditions of the category. Thus, strategies were created aiming at actions involving the continuous care line, including health education, promotion and prevention. The actions are carried out with a multiprofessional Primary Care team, Family Health Support Center and specialized service actions involving integral, individual and collective care. Objectives To promote and prevent health education, seeking to improve physical, psychological and social aspects and strengthen the professional bond. Methodology The project is a descriptive study with a cross-sectional quali-quantitative approach. An individual assessment was performed based on the WHOQOL-bref questionnaire with some adaptations by the Family Health Support Center team. This questionnaire will be reapplied and analyzed every four months for reevaluation with the multiprofessional team to continue the care of each member of the group. The meetings are held monthly and according to the need of the community. Results Improve interaction, cooperation, rapprochement and flexibility in the category of Community Health and Endemic Agents and with other professionals, thus awakening to health care. Conclusion As a permanent project, continuous and having started ...


Review article of Global Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research Trigemme neuralgia: literature review Santana, J.F¹; Santos, G.A²; França, L.C³, Ramos, L.V.S4, Lima, L.F.A5; Maia, C.S6 1,2,3,4,5Students of the Course of Dentistry - UFPE; 6Docente /Researcher of the Department of Histology and Embryology of UFPE. Introduction: Neuralgia is a pain that stretches along the path of a nerve. As regions of the head and neck are more affected places and a trigeminal neuralgia is more common among facial neuralgias. Objective: To review the literature on the concept, diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Methodology: An integrated review was carried out in the MEDLINE, LILACS and SCIELO Virtual Library databases, using the following documents: Neuragia and Trigêmeio. The results of the research were published in all cases, in Portuguese, Portuguese and Portuguese. Results and Discussion: The search resulted in 6,205 articles, these, 30 were separated by amount of subject matter, however, only Nine meeting the inclusion criteria. A trigeminal neuralgia belongs to the group of chronic pain conditions and is classified as primary and secondary. It has a predominance of females, between 50 and 70 years of age and almost always is unilateral. Pain is characterized as paroxysmal, acute, superficial, triggered by the estimation of trigger zones, most of the life born and the skin of the middle region of the face. The patient may present hyposthesia or paraesthesia of a certain area and paralysis of one or more masticatory muscles. The diagnosis is clinical, as well as complementary tests in cases of neuropathic pain. The initial treatment is done by non-invasive methods, with the use of carbamazepine medicines. It can be surgically tested, which is success in 70 and 85% of cases. Conclusion: The articles presented, of facial neuralgias, one that is a bit slower and more common. It has a ...

The editorial policies in this page are the guidelines of publication process of eSciPub journals. We adhere to the following requirements and recommendations including but not limited to Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers (STM) , and World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). 

Editors control the quality of publications in eSciPub Journals. Editorial duties may include but not limited to review manuscripts to make sure the submission meet the requirements of Author Guidelines, referee the submissions to right peer reviewers, give comments to improve the quality of manuscripts and decide the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts.

  • Take in charge of searching the members of editorial board and reviewers;
  • Give possible suggestions to improve the quality of the journals of eSciPub;
  • Follow publication ethics;
  • Determine rejection or acceptance of a submission;
  • Search peer reviewers;
  • Communicate authors and reviewers;
  • Answer the questions of authors and reviewers;
  • Recruit authors to publish high quanlity papers in eSciPub journals;

Manuscript Title: The title should be a brief phrase.

Author Information: List full names and affiliation of all authors, including Emails and phone numbers of corresponding author.

Abstract: The abstract should be less than 500 words. Following abstract, a list of keywords and abbreviations should be added. The keywords should be no more than 10. Abbreviation are only used for non standard and long terms.

Introduction: The introduction should included a clear statement of current problems.

Materials and Methods: This section should be clearly described.

Results and discussion: Authors may put results and discussion into a single section or show them separately.

Acknowledgement: This section includes a brief acknowledgment of people, grant details, funds

References: References should be listed in a numbered citation order at the end of the manuscript. DOIs and links to referenced articles should be added if available. Abstracts and talks for conferences or papers not yet accepted should not be cited. Examples Published Papers: 

1. Avinaba Mukherjee, Sourav Sikdar, Anisur Rahman Khuda-Bukhsh. Evaluation of ameliorative potential of isolated flavonol fractions from Thuja occidentalis in lung cancer cells and in Benzo(a) pyrene induced lung toxicity in mice. International Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, 2016; 1(1): 0001-0013. 
2. Vikas Gupta, Parveen Bansal, Junaid Niazi, Kamlesh Kohli, Pankaj Ghaiye. Anti-anxiety Activity of Citrus paradisi var. duncan Extracts in Swiss Albino Mice-A Preclinical Study. Journal of Herbal Medicine Research, 2016; 1(1): 0001-0006.

Tables and figures: Tables should be used at a minimum with a short descriptive title. The preferred file formats for Figures/Graphics are GIF, TIFF, JPEG or PowerPoint.

Proofreading and Publication: A proof will be sent to the corresponding author before publication. Authors should carefully read the proof to avoid any errors and return the proof to the editorial office. Editorial office will publish the article shortly and send a notice to authors with the links of the paper.

The Peer review policy in this page are the guidelines of publication process of eSciPub Journals. We adhere to the following requirements and recommendations including but not limited to Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers (STM) , and World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). 

The Review Process mainly includes those steps: Receive a invitation to review, Accept invitation, Review the manuscript, Submit your review. As a reviewer of eSciPub publisher, you will receive our invitation to review a manuscript by e-mail.

Please make sure that you are an expertise within the area of the manuscript and without any conflict of interest with the manuscript you will review. Please keep in mind that manuscripts emailed to reviewers are for the purpose of critical evaluation only. Reviewer must keep manuscripts and the review process confidentially. As a reviewer, he/she should review and return their comments in a timely manner. If you can not submit your comments in the agreed time, please inform us ASAP to avoid any delays.

Once finish the review process of a manuscript, you should submit your comments to eSciPub editors. The specific recommendations are as follows:

• Accept

• Minor revision

• Moderate revision

• Major revision

• Reject

Please feel free to contact our rapid response team if you have any questions. Our customer representative will answer you shortly.

Open Access

Global Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research (ISSN:2637-6245; DOI:10.28933/GJACR) is a peer reviewed open access journal publishing research manuscripts, review articles, editorials, letters to the editor in Anesthesia and Clinical Research (Indexing information).

Peer Review

To ensure the quality of the publications, all submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by invited experts in the field. The decisions of editors will be made based on the comments of the reviewers.

Rapid Publication

Time to first decision: within 2 days for initial decision without review, 18 days with review; Time to publication: Accepted articles will be published online within 2 days, and final corrected versions by authors will be accessible within 5 days.  More details....

Rapid Response Team

Please feel free to contact our rapid response team if you have any questions. Our customer representative will answer your questions shortly.

Global Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research