Use of Internet for medical information by patients & its impact on Consultation time- A Patient Survey

Use of Internet for medical information by patients & its impact on Consultation time- A Patient Survey

Hemanth.K.Subrahmanyam  DLO, DOHNS ,DNB (ORL), Fellow of European Board in 0RL-HNS

Associate Specialist, Department of ENT, Kettering General Hospital, Rothwell Road, Kettering NN16 8UZ, U.K.

International-Journal-of-Case-Reports-2d code

Our patient survey revealed that there is equal number of Internet user and Internet non-user patients visiting our outpatient consultation. This raises an interesting fact about the importance of the need for the present day clinician to keep updated about not only the recent advances in the field but also with the IT skills. Literature has suggested prior Internet awareness amongst patients have resulted in explicitly patient controlled outcomes during consultation (10). Our patient survey did not focus on this aspect. Statistically significant was the increased consultation time of 0.8 minutes among the Internet user group in comparison to the Internet non-user group is still debatable. But does this point to the possible change in the consultation models in the Internet age is still questionable. Poor IT skills among the clinicians may result in defensively asserting an authoritative “expert opinion” when encountered with the Internet user group of patients as studies do suggest (10).

Though the internet has revolutionized the world with access and availability of information, health texts needs more regulation as it does seem to start having an impact on the consultation times as seen in our patient survey. Is this the beginning of a change for the physician-patient relationship model in the Internet age?

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:
Hemanth.K.Subrahmanyam. Use of Internet for medical information by patients & its impact on Consultation time- A Patient Survey. International Journal of Case Reports, 2017 1:8. DOI:10.28933/ijcr-2017-04-2101


1.; BBC. Health websites gaining popularity. URL: (accessed 2002 Sep 19)
2.; Datamonitor.Online consumer segmentation. URL: (accessed 2002 Oct 23)
3.Fox S, Rainie L. Vital decisions. How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Washington, DC: Pew Interest & American Life Project; May 22, 2002. URL:
4.; Department of Health. Building the information core implementing the NHS plan. London: Department of Health; Jan 2001. URL:
5.Graham W,Smith P,Kamal A, Fitzmaurice A,Hamilton N. Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen system with leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests. BMJ 2000 Jan 15;320(7228):155-160(FREE Full text) (PMC:10634736) (Medline : 20100672) (doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7228.155)
6.Hardey M. ‘E-health’: the internet and the transformation of patients into consumers and producers of health knowledge. Information, Communication & Society 2001;4(3):388-405. (doi:10.1080/13691180127053)
7.Ferguson T. Health online and the empowered medical consumer.Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1997 May;23(5):251-257. (Medline:97323227)
8.Eysenbach G.Consumer health informatics. BMJ 2000 Jun 24;320(7251):1713-1716 (FREE Full text) (Medline: 20323060) (doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1713)
9.Wald SH, Dube EC, Anthony CD. Untangling the web-The impact of Internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling Vol.68, Issue 3, Nov 2007, pg:218-224 (doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.016)
10. Hart A,Henwood F, Wyatt S. The Role of the Internet in Patient-Practitioner Relationships: Findings from a Qualitative Research Study. J Med Internet Res 2004/vol 6/iss. 3/e36

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details).

This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.