Case Report of International Journal of Case Reports
Natural orifice endoscopic drainage of a perforated duodenal ulcer
Mark Scaife MD, Thomas J Melvin MD, Harry W Sell MD, Kurt R Stahlfeld MD
UPMC Mercy Department of Surgery 1400 Locust St Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Posterior perforation of gastric and duodenal ulcers is uncommon and frequently misdiagnosed due to nonspecific clinical exam findings. The need for surgical treatment has recently been questioned in patients with contained perforations due to the success of nonoperative management and the morbidity and mortality associated with surgical intervention.
We present a clinically stable 65-year-old morbidly obese female transferred to our institution with radiographic evidence of posterior perforation of a duodenal ulcer with a large associated abscess cavity. A fenestrated 9.5 French nasal feeding tube was directed over a guide-wire into the abscess cavity under endoscopic/fluoroscopic guidance and used for decompression. The patient was managed conservatively and repeat computed tomography (CT) demonstrated resolution of the cavity. She was discharged to home after an uncomplicated 10-day hospital course.
Contained posterior peptic/duodenal ulcer perforations associated with an abscess cavity can be successfully managed conservatively in patients that are hemodynamically stable and without overt signs of peritonitis. Natural orifice drainage of the cavity, gastric decompression, antibiotics, PPI administration, and nutritional support can avoid the morbidity and mortality associated with traditional surgical management.
Keywords: Natural orifice, Endoscopy, Peptic ulcer, Duodenal ulcer, Perforation, Posterior Perforation
How to cite this article:
Mark Scaife, Thomas J Melvin, Harry W Sell, Kurt R Stahlfeld. Natural orifice endoscopic drainage of a perforated duodenal ulcer. International Journal of Case Reports, 2018 3:31. DOI: 10.28933/ijcr-2018-07-2401.
1. Wong CH, Chow PK, Ong HS, Chan WH, Khin LW, Soo KC. Posterior perforation of peptic ulcers: presentation and outcome of an uncommon surgical emergency. Surgery 2004;1 35(3):321-5
2. Songne B, Jean F, Foulatier O, Khalil H, Scotté M. Non operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer: results of a prospective study. Ann Chir 2004; 129(10):578-82.
3. Crofts TJ, Park KG, Steele RJ, Chung SS, Li AK. A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 1989; 320(15):970-3
4. Xu QY, Yin GW, Chen SX, Jiang F, Bai XJ, Wu JD. Fluoroscopically guided nose tube drainage of mediastinal abscesses in post-operative gastro-eosophageal anastomotic leakage. Br J Radiol 2012;85(1019):1477-81
5. Sharma BC, Kumar R, Agarwal N, Sarin SK. Endoscopic biliary drainage by nasobiliary drain or by stent placement in patients with acute cholangitis. Endoscopy 2005;37(5):439-43
6. Wangensteen O. Non-operative treatment of localized perforations of the duodenum. Minn Med 1935;18:477
7. Taylor H. Perforated peptic ulcer; treated without operation. Lancet 1946 ;2(6422):441-4
8. Crofts TJ, Park KG, Steele RJ, Chung SS, Li AK. A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 1989 ;320(15)970-3
9. Saber A, Gad MA, Ellabban GM. Perforated duodenal ulcer in high risk patients: is percutaneous drainage justified? N Am J Med Sci. 2012 ;4(1):35-9
10. Smallwood NR et al. The use of endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy in the management of upper gastrointestinal leaks and perforations. Surg Endo 2016; 30(6): 2473-80