Food security in the time of Coronavirus (COVID-19). The Argentine case

Food security in the time of Coronavirus (COVID-19). The Argentine case

Leda Giannuzzi

Toxicology Laboratory, Exacts Sciences College, National University of La Plata (UNLP), La Plata, Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos (CIDCA), CCT-La Plata. Facultad Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Street 47 and 116 (1900) La Plata, Argentina.

International Journal of Food and Nutrition Research

The context of pandemic of the human coronavirus COVID-19, preventive strategies based on mandatory social isolation (quarantine) were imposed by governments to reduce transmission in the community. However, they have had a strong impact on the economies of the countries and on the people as massive layoffs, decreased wages, uncertainty, inability to work formally, increasing precariousness and inequality and food insecurity. Without a doubt, the pandemic surprised Argentina without the necessary tools to amortize the attacks of the disease, and all the collateral consequences that emerge from it.

The concept of food insecurity represents a situation or a process experienced by households in which there is a limited and uncertain availability of the quantity and quality of food that allow covering the nutritional requirements of people, thus as an also limited and uncertain availability of the ability to acquire them in an acceptable way from a social and cultural perspective. This work addresses household food insecurity at the micro-social level based on their own surveys and describes the strategies carried out by households in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires city, Argentina to withstand the effect. FI status was assessed among 200 adult university students a mean age of 28±6 years (57% female, 43% male) during isolation period in April -May 2020 using the food insecurity experience scale (FIES).

The students responded affirmatively and with a higher percentage value to the items related to the lack of money to consume healthy and nutritious food.  Food security status of the 200 students survey, 23.5 per cent (n = 47) were food secure. Food insecurity was reported by 76.5% (n = 153). Of these, 50% (n = 100) were mild food insecurity, 25.5% (n = 51) were moderate, while 1% (n = 2) were severe food insecurity.

Food insecurity derived from access, as well as the difficulties of finding variety in food at affordable prices due to the obstacles imposed by the isolation affected food security.  The changes on food intake during quarantine period was also analysed. In the current particular situation, it is advisable to improve the consumption of fresh food. Meat consumption has also been altered, shifting its consumption to cuts of less economic value. Among the reasons for this change in eating habits during this period, it is possible that the increase in stress, anxiety due to isolation, as well as the economic reasons and those that result from difficulties in accessing points of sale could explain these changes.

Keywords: Food security; COVID-19; FIES survey; Changes in food consumption; Argentina; Pandemic

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:
Leda Giannuzzi. Food security in the time of Coronavirus (COVID-19). The Argentine case. International Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 2020; 4:38.. DOI:10.28933/ijfnr-2020-09-2505


1. World Bank (2020)
2. Ministry of Agro-industries, Ministry of Production (2017) Alimentos Argentinos
3. United State Department of Agriculture. Definitions of Food Security. Available online at:
4. IPCVA). IPCVA El Instituto de Promoción de la Carne Vacuna Argentina. (2019)
5. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), 2002. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2001. Rome.
6. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), 1996. El Programa Especial para la Seguridad Alimentaria. Roma: FAO.
7. ECLAC. Economic Commissions for Latin-American and the Caribbean’s, 2018.
8. INDEC. The National Statistics Institute INDEC (2019).
9. National Food Emergency Law (2019) National Food Emergency, Law 27519,
10. CELAC, 2016,
11. Global Hungry Index, 2019.
12. Ballard, T. J., Kepple, AW., Cafiero, C. The Food Insecurity Experience Scale: Development of a Global Standard for Monitoring Hunger Worldwide. 2013. FAO, Rome.
13. EDSA UCA. Observatory-of-Social-Debt-Argentina/statistics-edsa
14. FAO/WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Transforming food sys-tems to promote affordable and healthy diets. Roma, 2020,
15. Frongillo, EA. (1999) Validation of measures of food insecurity and hunger. J. Nutr. 129: 506S–509S.
16. Sudriá, ME., Andreatta MM., Defagó, MD, 2020. Los efectos de la cuarentena por coronavirus (covid-19) en los hábitos alimen- tarios en Argentina DIAETA; N 38, 10 – 19.
17. Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Guías Alimentarias para la Población Argentina, Buenos Aires. 2016.
18. IPCVA. El Instituto de Promoción de la Carne Vacuna Argentina (2019)
19. Martinez Steele E., Baraldi LG, Louzada ML, Moubarac J-C, Mozaffarian D, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 2016, 6(3), e009892. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892
20. Moubarac J-C, Batal M, Louzada ML, Martinez SE, Monteiro CA et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite (2016) 108:512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006
21. World Health Organization. Prevalence of obesity among adults, BMI ≥ 30, age-standardized Estimates by WHO region. (1990)
22. Jones D., Camarotti, A.C. Consumo de alcohol en cuarentena por COVID-19. Encuesta en el área Metropolitana de Buenos Aires, (mayo 2020). Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, UBA.
23. Global Report on Food Crises. Joint analysis for better decisions Food Security Information Network, 2020.
24. INDEC. The National Statistics Institute. Dirección de Índices de Precios de Consumo. Valorización mensual de la canasta básica alimentaria y de la canasta básica total. Gran Buenos Aires, 2020, 4: 106.
25. OPS Pan American Health. Organization Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nati-ons 1996. The Special Program for Food Security. 2019. Roma: FAO.
26. Garg S, Kim L, Whitaker M, et al. Hospitalization Rates and Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 — COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2020) 69:458– icon.
27. Orioli L, Hermans MP, Thissena JP, Maiter D, Vandeleenea B, Yombi J-C. COVID-19 in diabetic patients: Related risks and specifics of management COVID-19. Annales d’Endocrinologie (2020) 81: 2-3, 101-109.
28. Simonnet A, Chetboun M, Poissy J, et al. High Prevalence of Obesity in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Obesity (2020) 28: 1195 – 1199.
29. Damiot A, Pinto A, Turner JE, Gualano B. Immunological Implications of Physical Inactivity among Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gerontology (2020) DOI: 10.1159/000509216
30. Soriano JM, González A, Soler C, Catalá-Gregori AI, Merino-Torres JF. Body Mass Index (BMI) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Living Systematic Review. Preprints. 2020, doi: 10.20944 / preprints202005.0166. v1.