Review Article of International Journal of Philosophical Research
Article critique: “Effects of Leadership on Student Success through the Balanced Leadership Framework”
Dibekulu Alem Asegu
Bahir Dar University
Cetin and Kinik wrote an article entitled “Effects of Leadership on Student Success through the Balanced Leadership Framework” and this critique focuses on this article. The author aims to investigate the role of balanced leadership for students’ success despite the mismatch between his purpose and the way he discussed balanced leadership. In this study, after reviewing the literature, a qualitative analysis related to the 8 leadership responsibilities (Culture, Ideals and Beliefs, Communication, Visibility, Input, Relationships, Situational Awareness, Affirmation) that are necessary to form the Purposeful Community (which is not exactly match with the intended purpose students success) has been made. The author raised interesting issue in the leadership arena but the issues raised are not in line with the role of balanced leadership on students’ success that goes beyond this creation of purposeful community which seems broad aim to be succeed after long time of schooling. To this end, reviewer underscored that however the author inclined to bring hot and ample issue the way he pass through needs revision and re correction, ways of sampling, singularity of data collection instrument leads to problem of generalizability, replicability and trustworthiness of the findings.
Keywords: Balanced Leadership, Leadership Responsibilities, Student Success, Purposeful Community
How to cite this article:
Dibekulu Alem Asegu. Article critique: “Effects of Leadership on Student Success through the Balanced Leadership Framework”. International Journal of Philosophical Research, 2019; 1:4.
1. Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management development in education. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.
2. Cetin, M. & Kinik, F.S. (2016). Effect of leadership on students success through the balanced leadership framework. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(4): 675-682, DOI:10.13189/ujer.2016.040403
3. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
4. Deal, H.G. (2010). Science research writing: For Non-native speakers of English. London: Imperial college press.
5. Gunter, H.M. (2001). Leaders and leadership in education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
6. Marzano, R.J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B.A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. USA: Library of congress.
7. Masson, J. (2002). Qualitative researching ( 2nd Ed.). London: SAGE publications Inc.
8. Merriam, S.B.(2009). Qualitative research: A Guide to design and implementation: USA:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.