Review Article of International Journal of Social Research
Travel behavior characteristics in Nigeria’s most commercialized urban development: a Study of Eti- Osa Local Government, Lagos Nigeria
Adeniyi O Oluwakoya1 and Seun Ogundipe2
1Department of Transport and Tourism Studies Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria. 2Department of Transport and Tourism Studies, Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State. Nigeria.
Globalisation has enhanced the rate of urbanisation and influenced the travel behaviour characteristics across the cities of the world. Remarkably, in the case of Nigeria, especially in the most commercialised local government area, the travel pattern seems erratic and unpredictable; problems associated with urban mobility include delay, traffic congestion, and chaotic trip pattern characteristics. In this regards, most related studies seems to be biased towards the developed economics urban metropolitan areas. Therefore this study intends to examine the travel behavior characteristics in Nigeria’s most commercialised local government area. The methodology involves both the qualitative and the quantitative methods. The data is analysed with descriptive, chi-square statistical and regression analytical techniques. The study reveals that socio-economic characteristics especially gender, and the female to be specific contributes more to the volume of trips in the study area than the men. In addition, it shows there is a significant relationship between the mode of transport and level of accessibility among the residents of policy.
Keywords: Travel behavior characteristics, Nigeria’s most commercialized urban development, Eti-Osa Local Government, Lagos
How to cite this article:
Adeniyi O Oluwakoya and Seun Ogundipe. Travel behavior characteristics in Nigeria’s most commercialized urban development: a Study of Eti-Osa Local Government, Lagos Nigeria . International Journal of Social Research, 2019; 3:31. DOI: 10.28933/ijsr-2019-04-1005
1. Akcelik, R. and Troutbeck, R. (1991). Implementation of the Australian roundabout analysis method in SIDRA. In: Highway Capacity and Level of Service – Proc. of the International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Karlsruhe, July 1991 (Edited by U. Brannolte). A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 17-34.
2. Bagley, M.N., Mokhtarian, P.L., (2002). The impact of residential neighbourhood type in travel behaviour: a structural equation modelling approach. Annals of Regional Science 36 (2), 279–297.
3. Bhat, C.R. and F.S. Koppelman (1998) A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research, under consideration for possible publication in a special time-use issue in Transportation.
4. Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y., (2007). A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transportation Research B 41, 506–526.
5. Boarnet, M.G., Sarmiento, S., (1998). Can land use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land use characteristics. Paper Presented at the Lincoln Land Institute TRED Conference, October 1998.
6. Boarnet, M.G., Sarmiento, S., (1998). Can land use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land use characteristics. Paper Presented at the Lincoln Land Institute TRED Conference, October 1998.
7. Cao, S., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L., (2007a). Cross-sectional and quasi-panel exploration of the connection between the built environment and auto ownership. Environment and Planning A 39 (4), 830–847.
8. Cervero, R., Kockelman, K., (1997). Travel demand and the 3D’s: density, diversity and design. Transportation Research D 2 (3), 199–219.
9. Chen, C., Gong, H., Paaswell, R., (2008). Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density. Transportation 35, 285–299
10. Chien, S.I-J. and Kuchipudi, C. M. (2003) Dynamic travel time prediction with real-time and historical data, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 6, 608-616.
11. Curtis, P. (1995). Urban Household Coping Strategies During War: Bosnia-Hercegovina. Disasters, 19(1), 68–73.doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1995. tb00335.x
12. Dargay, J., Hanly, M., (2004). Land Use and Mobility. Paper Presented at the World Conference on Transport Research. Istanbul, Turkey, July 2004.
13. Dargay, J., Hanly, M., (2004). Land Use and Mobility. Paper Presented at the World Conference on Transport Research. Istanbul, Turkey, July 2004.
14. Dargay, J.M., (2002). Determinants of car ownership in rural and urban areas: a pseudo-panel analysis. Transportation Research E 38, 351–366.
15. D’Este, G.M., Zito, R. and Taylor, M.A.P. (1999) Using GPS to Measure Traffic System Performance, Journal of Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 14, 273-283.
16. Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M., Burghouwt, G., (2002). Urban form and travel behaviour:micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Studies 39 (3), 507–527.
17. Ewing, R., Haliyur, P., Page, G.W., (1994). Getting around a traditional city, a suburban planned unit development, and everything in between. Transportation ResearchRecord 1466, 53–62.
18. Filani, M.O. (1991), Mobility Crisis in Nigeria Federal Government’s Mass Transit Programme”, Annals of the Social Science Council of Nigeria, No. 3, pp.13-30.
19. Filani, M.O. (1993), “Transport and Rural Development in Nigeria”, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 1 No.4, pp. 248-254.
20. Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P.L., Johnston, R.A., (2008). Exploring the connections between job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modelling. Annals of Regional Science 42, 341–356.
21. Gärling, T., M.P. Kwan and R.G. Golledge (1994) Computational-process modelling of household travel activity scheduling, Transportation Research, 25B, 355-364
22. Geurs, K.T., van Wee, B., (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 12, 127–140.
23. Gordon, R. M., Coale, K. H., & Johnson, K. S. (1997). Iron distributions in the equatorial Pacific: Implications for new production. Limnology and Oceanography, 42(3), 419–431.doi:10.4319/lo.1997.42.3.0419
24. Gordon, P., Kumar, A., & Richardson, H. W. (1989). Gender differences in metropolitan travel behaviour. Regional Studies, 23(6), 499-510.
25. Gorham, R., (2002). Comparative neighbourhood travel analysis: an approach to understanding the relationship between planning and travel behaviour. In: Mahmassani, H.S. (Ed.), In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp. 237–259.
26. Hammadou, H., Thomas, I., Verhetsel, A., Witlox, F. (2008). How to incorporate the spatial dimension in destination choice models: the case of Antwerp. Transportation Planning and Technology 31, 153–181.
27. Handy, S.L. (2005). Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: what does the research tell us? International Regional Science Review 28 (2), 146–167.
28. Handy, S.L., Cao, X.Y., Mokhtarian, P.L., (2005). Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behaviour? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research D 10 (6), 427–444.
29. Hanson, S. and G. Giuliano (eds) (2017) The Geography of Urban Transportation, Fourth Edition, New York: The Guilford Press.
30. Hess, P.M., Moudon, A.V., Snyder, M.C., Stanilov, K., 1999. Site design and pedestrian travel. Transportation Research Record (1674), 9–19.
31. Hoyle, B.S., Knowles, R.D., 1998. Modern Transport Geography seconded. Wiley, London.
32. Janelle, D. G. and M. F. Goodchild (2011). Concepts, Principles, Tools, and Challenges in Spatially Integrated Social Science. In Nyerges, T.L., H. Couclelis, and R. McMaster (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of GIS & Society. Sage Publications. pp 27-45.
33. Karl, C.A., Charles, S. and Trayford, R. (1999) Delivery of Real-Time and Predictive Travel Time Information: Experiences from a Melbourne Trial. Proceedings of 6th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Toronto, Canada.
34. Kisgyorgy, L. and Rilett, L.R. (2002) Travel Time Prediction by Advanced Neural Network., PeriodicaPolytechnica Civil Engineering, Vol. 46, No. 1, 15-32.
35. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L., Laidet, L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighbourhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24 (2), 125–158.
36. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L., Laidet, L., (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighbourhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24 (2), 125–158.
37. Kockelman, K.M., (1997). Travel behaviour as a function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance. Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. TransportationRecord 1607, 116–125.
38. Krizek, K.J., (2003). Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: does neighbourhood-scale urban form matter? Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (3), 265–281.
39. Levinson, H., Wynn, F., (1963). Effects of density on urban transportation requirements. Highway Research Record 2, 38–64.
40. Li, Y. and McDonald, M. (2002) Link Travel Time Estimation Using Single GPS Equipped Probe Vehicle. Proceedings of The IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, Singapore, 932-937, September 2002.
41. Lum, K.M., Fan, H. S.L., Lam, S.H. and Olszewski, P. (1998) Speed-Flow Modeling of Arterial Roads in Singapore, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 124, no. 6, 213-222.
42. May, A. D. (2013). Urban transport and sustainability: The key challenges. International journal of sustainable transportation, 7(3), 170-185.
43. McNally, M.G., Kulkarni, A., (1997). Assessment of the influence of land use transportation system on travel behaviour. Transportation Research Record 1607, 105–115.
44. Meurs, H., Haaijer, R., (2001). Spatial structure and mobility. Transportation Research D 6, 429–446.
45. Naess, A., (1995). Self-realization. An ecological approach to being in the world, In G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century, Boston and London (Shambhala) 1995, pp. 225-239.
46. Rajamani, J., Bhat, C.R., Handy, S., Knaap, G., Song, Y., (2003). Assessing the impact of urban form measures on nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transportation Research Record 1831, 158–165
47. Salon, D., & Aligula, E. M. (2012). Urban travel in Nairobi, Kenya: analysis, insights, and opportunities. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 65-76.
48. Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M. (2004). The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behaviour in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach. Growth and Change 35 (3), 304–333.
49. Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M., (2004). The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behaviour in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach. Growth and Change 35 (3), 304–333.
50. Simma, A., Axhausen, K.W., (2003). Interactions between travel behaviour, accessibility and personal characteristics: the case of upper Austria. European Journal on Transport Infrastructure and Research 3 (2), 179–197.
51. Soltani, A., (2005). Exploring the impacts of built environments on vehicle ownership. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5, 2151–2163.
52. Spence, N., Linneker, B. (1994). Evolution of the motorway network and changing levels of accessibility in Great Britain. Journal of Transport Geography 2(4), 247-264.
53. Stead, D., (2001). Relationships between land use, socioeconomic factors and travel patterns in Britain. Environment and Planning B 28 (4), 499–528.
54. Stead, D., (2001). Relationships between land use, socioeconomic factors and travel patterns in Britain. Environment and Planning B 28 (4), 499–528.
55. Stead, D., Marshall, S., (2001). The relationships between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. European Journal on Transport Infrastructure and Research 1 (2), 113–141.
56. Taylor, M.A.P., Woolley, J.E. and Zito, R. (2000c) Integration of the global positioning system and geographical information systems for traffic congestion studies, Transport Research-Part C, Vol. 8, 257-285.
57. Tisato, P. (1991). Suggestions for an improved Davidson travel time function. Australian Road Research, 21(2), pp. 85-100.
58. Van Acker, V., Witlox, F., van Wee, B., (2007). The effects of the land-use system on travel behaviour: a structural equation modelling approach. Transportation Planning and Technology 30 (4), 331–354.
59. Whelan, G., (2007). Modelling car ownership in Great Britain. Transportation Research A 41, 205–219.
60. Witlox, F. (2007). Evaluating the reliability of reported distance data in urban travel behaviour analysis. Journal of Transport Geography 15, 172–183.
61. Wu, C.-F. (2001) The Study of Vehicle Travel Time Estimation using GPS, Department of Transportation Technology & Management, (Master Thesis), National Chiao Tung University, Taipei.
62. Zhang, M., (2004). The role of land use in travel mode choice. Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (3), 344–360.
63. Zito, R. and Taylor, M.A.P. (1994) The use of GPS in travel-time surveys, Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 35, No. 12, 685-690.
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.