Research article of Journal of Plant and Environmental Research
Treatment & Reclamation Of Train And Track Wash Water At Trivandrum Railway Station
Sarayoo K Sudhakaran and Lea Mathew
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering Trivandrum, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala,India.
Trivandrum central railway station is one of the biggest customers of Kerala water au-thority. The water consumption of railway station is about 50 ML/ month. A major por-tion of the water consumed is utilized for washing trains and tracks. Therefore, about 0.8 MLD of waste water is produced as train and track wash water in the Trivandrum cen-tral railway station. This waste water is discharged into public sewage line without any treatment. If this waste water can be reclaimed it can be reused for washing trains, tracks and platforms.
In this study, the waste water samples at Trivandrum railway station were taken from three sources (Bio toilet effluent, fresh train wash water, sewage line waste water) and examined for the water quality parameters. The initial water quality parameters of the sample inferred that this waste water is treatable and reclaimable. For that a lab scale model of treatment unit was set up. After the treatment, the maximum BOD reduction was 94%, COD reduction 82.5%, Total solids reduction 98% and oil& grease reduction 99% was reported. The final effluent quality parameters satisfied KSPCB limits. The maximum quantity of waste water produced was found as 0.8 MLD from the data. By treating 8L of waste water in the lab scale model, a good quality effluent of 2.5L was obtained. By implementing a WWTP in the Trivandrum railway station 0.25 MLD of water can thus be reclaimed.
Keywords: WWTP, KSPCB,BOD,COD
How to cite this article:
Sarayoo K Sudhakaran and Lea Mathew. Treatment & Reclamation Of Train And Track Wash Water At Trivandrum Railway Station. Journal of Plant and Environmental Research, 2020,4:17
1. Delnavaz, M., Ayati, B. and Ganjidoust, H. (2010) ‘Prediction of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) performance for the treatment of aniline using artificial neural networks (ANN)’, Journal of Hazardous Materials. Elsevier B.V., 179(1–3), pp. 769–775. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.069.
2. Feng, Q. et al. (2012) ‘Effects of packing rates of cubic-shaped polyurethane foam carriers on the microbial community and the removal of organics and nitrogen in moving bed biofilm reactors’, Bioresource Technology. Elsevier Ltd, 117, pp. 201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.076.
3. Francis, A. and Sosamony, K. J. (2016) ‘Treatment of Pre-treated Textile Wastewater using Moving Bed Bio-film Reactor’, Procedia Technology. Elsevier B.V., 24, pp. 248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.033.
4. Harinarayanan Nampoothiri, M. G., Manilal, A. M. and Soloman, P. A. (2016) ‘Control of Electrocoagulation Batch Reactor for Oil removal from Automobile Garage Wastewater’, Procedia Technology. Elsevier B.V., 24, pp. 603–610. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.136.
5. Hosseini, S. H. and Borghei, S. M. (2005) ‘The treatment of phenolic wastewater using a moving bed bio-reactor’, Process Biochemistry, 40(3–4), pp. 1027–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.05.002.
6. Jahren, S. J., Rintala, J. A. and Ødegaard, H. (2002) ‘Aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor treating thermomechanical pulping whitewater under thermophilic conditions’, Water Research, 36(4), pp. 1067–1075. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00311-6.
7. Khorram, A. G. and Fallah, N. (2018) ‘Treatment of textile dyeing factory wastewater by electrocoagulation with low sludge settling time: Optimization of operating parameters by RSM’, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. Elsevier B.V., 6(1), pp. 635–642. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.054.
8. Leiknes, T. and Ødegaard, H. (2007) ‘The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor’, Desalination, 202(1–3), pp. 135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.049.
9. Natarajan, R., Al Fazari, F. and Al Saadi, A. (2018) ‘Municipal waste water treatment by natural coagulant assisted electrochemical technique—Parametric effects’, Environmental Technology and Innovation. Elsevier B.V., 10, pp. 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2018.01.011.
10. Pastorelli, G. et al. (1997) ‘Organic carbon and nitrogen removal in moving-bed biofilm reactors’, Water Science and Technology. International Association on Water Quality, 35(6), pp. 91–99. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00099-1.
11. Poornima Parvathi, V., Umadevi, M. and Bhaviya Raj, R. (2015) ‘Improved waste water treatment by bio-synthesized Graphene Sand Composite’, Journal of Environmental Management. Elsevier Ltd, 162, pp. 299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.055.
12. Rajasulochana, P. and Preethy, V. (2016) ‘Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water – A comprehensive review’, Resource-Efficient Technologies. Elsevier B.V., 2(4), pp. 175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.reffit.2016.09.004.
13. Ren, M. et al. (2011) ‘Treatment of berberine hydrochloride wastewater by using pulse electro-coagulation process with Fe electrode’, Chemical Engineering Journal. Elsevier B.V., 169(1–3), pp. 84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.056.
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.