Participatory Variety Selection for Enhanced Promotion and Adoption of Improved Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench] Varieties for the Humid Lowland of Assosa Zone, Western Ethiopia

Participatory Variety Selection for Enhanced Promotion and Adoption of Improved Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench] Varieties for the Humid Lowland of Assosa Zone, Western Ethiopia

Tokuma Legesse1*, Habtamu Demelash1, Amare Seyoum2

1Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Assosa Research Center, Assosa, Ethiopia
2Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Melkassa Research Center, Adama, Ethiopia

Scientific Research and Reviews

The development of Successful improved sorghum varieties for the western part of Ethiopia particularly Benishangulgumuz requires the incorporation of farmer’s perceptions and desires into the end product. Failure to do this in the past probably explains the low rates of adoption of improved varieties in Benishangulgumuz national regional state. Therefore, a variety developed through PVS usually meets demand of different stakeholders as a result the lowland sorghum varieties were evaluated in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications in main cropping season during 2018 at Kurmuk district. Participatory rural appraisal tools such as focus group discussions, matrix ranking and individual reviews were used to collect data from farmers from their sorghum selection criteria, preferences and acceptance of the new improved sorghum varieties. Therefore the experiment was initiated with the objective to evaluate and select well adapted and best performing humid lowland sorghum varieties to the targeted location. The result of current study clearly showed a significant difference between the tested varieties from most morphological traits. Biomass, and threshability, of improved varieties were the most important criteria for farmers to choose a new variety. Accordingly, farmers overwhelmingly selected Melkam followed by Assosa-1 sorghum variety. Farmers’ also gave priority for grain yield and earliness of varieties. Generally, early maturing varieties with high yield potential, resistance to foliar and grain diseases, would be welcomed by farmers. However, they had indicated they would not totally reject their local varieties because of social considerations.

Keywords: Adaptability, Direct matrix, Improved variety, Traits of interest,

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:
Tokuma Legesse, Habtamu Demelash, Amare Seyoum. Participatory Variety Selection for Enhanced Promotion and Adoption of Improved Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench] Varieties for the Humid Lowland of Assosa Zone, Western Ethiopia. Scientific Research and Reviews, 2019, 12:104


1. Taylor, J. R. N. (2004). Overview: Importance of sorghum in Africa.
2. Edwards, G. E., Franceschi, V. R. and Voznesenskaya, E. V. (2004). Single cell C4 photosynthesis versus the dual-cell (Kranz) paradigm. Annal Revised Plant Biology, 55: 173-196.
3. Blum A, Golan G, Mayer J, Sinmena B. 1997. The effect of the dwarfing genes on sorghum grain-filling from remobilized stem reserves under stress. Field Crops Res. 52: 43-54 Crossref
4. Reddy, B.V.S., Kumar, A. A. and Ramesh, S. 2007. Sweet sorghum: water saving bio-energy crop. Patancheru-502 324. International Crops Res. Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. Andhra Pradesh, India.
5. CSA (Central Statistical Agency), 2016; Agricultural Sample Survey Report on Area and Production for Major crops (Private Peasant Holdings Meher Season Statistical Bulletin 584, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
6. Adugna, A., 2008. Assessment of yield stability in sorghum using univariate and multivariate statistical approaches. Hereditas 145: 28-37.
7. McGuire S (1999). Farmers’ management of sorghum diversity in eastern Ethiopia, In: Almekinders, C., de Boef, W. (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity: The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources. Intermediate Technology Publications, London
8. MA (Ministry of Agriculture), 2016. Animal and Plant Health Regulatory Directorate. Crop Variety Register ISSUE NO. 15. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
9. Asfaw, A., 2007. The role of introduced sorghum and unpublished. Millets in Ethiopian agriculture. J. SAT Agri. Res., 15. Abdella, H.A., 1991. Evaluation of exotic and lowland 3 (1).
10. Joshi A, Witcombe JR (1996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection: A case study in India. Exp. Agric. 32: 461−477
11. Rebeka Gebretsadik Shimelis, H., Laing M. D., Tongoona P., and Mandefro, N., 2014. A diagnostic appraisal of the sorghum farming system and breeding priorities in Striga infested agro-ecologies of Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 123:54-61.
12. Ihaka, R., and Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for Data Analysis and Graphics. R-software package version 3.4.4; Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics; 3(5):299-314, Auckland in New Zealand.
13. Majid M, Rosnah M, Mohammad R. (2010). Determining and ranking essential criteria of Construction Project Selection in Telecommunication of North KhorasanIran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 1, No. 1ISSN:2010-0264.
14. Yirgu, M., 2012. Genetic gain in lowland sorghum [sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] varieties in Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University, Ethiopia.